Ìnformacìjnì tehnologìï v osvìtì | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2500 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Ìnformacìjnì tehnologìï v osvìtì

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name Ìnformacìjnì tehnologìï v osvìtì
Abbreviated Name Ìnformacìjnì tehnologìï v osvìtì
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2015
original paper the effect of leptin on the respiratory burst of human neutrophils cultured in synovial fluid
;Michał Gajewski;Przemysław Rzodkiewicz;Joanna Gajewska;Elżbieta Wojtecka-Łukasik
Vol. 53 , No. 1 , pp. 21-25
466 views DOI Abstract
2018
THE USE OF ICT IN TEACHING GIFTED STUDENTS ENGLISH COMMUNICATION
N., Kuznetsova;
Vol. 2 , No. 35 , pp. 040-053
425 views Abstract
2017
SATISFACTION OF QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF EMPLOYERS APPLIED TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERS IN THE PROCESS OF TRAINING AT HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
Kruhlyk, Vladislav;
, No. 30 , pp. 71-80
358 views Abstract
2014
the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in pediatric rheumatology
;Zbigniew Żuber;Marta Górnicka-Banach;Zofia Szymanowska;Dorota Turowska-Heydel;Małgorzata Sobczyk;Lidia Rutkowska-Sak
Vol. 52 , No. 3 , pp. 160-165
334 views DOI Abstract
2015
original paper changes in the morbidity and costs of systemic lupus erythematosus in poland in the years 2008–2012
;Andrzej Śliwczyński;Melania Brzozowska;Petre Iltchev;Tomasz Czeleko;Zbigniew Teter;Witold Tłustochowicz;Michał Marczak;Małgorzata Tłustochowicz
Vol. 53 , No. 2 , pp. 79-86
325 views DOI Abstract
2018
APPLICATION OF TEST SYSTEMS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS EVALUATION
Matviichuk, Liudmyla;Horoshko, Yurii;Tsybko, Hanna;Vinnychenko, Yevheniy;
Vol. 4 , No. 37 , pp. 093-102
320 views Abstract
2015
original paper cambridge neuropsychological test automated battery in assessment of cognitive parameters in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in relation to autoantibody profile
;Anna Bogaczewicz;Tomasz Sobow;Jan Kowalski;Jakub Ząbek;Anna Woźniacka;Jaroslaw Bogaczewicz
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. 131-138
281 views DOI Abstract
2018
FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AS A KNOWLEDGE AREA
, Andrii Striuk;
Vol. 4 , No. 37 , pp. 103-136
276 views Abstract
2016
aerococcus viridans infection presenting as cutaneous vasculitis in an immunocompetent patient
;Ashaq Hussain Parrey;Fayaz Sofi;Mushtaq Ahmad;Abid Kuchay
Vol. 54 , No. 6 , pp. 318-320
265 views DOI Abstract
2014
acute heart failure with left ventricular thrombus in the course of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
;Anna Masiak;Żaneta Smoleńska;Zenobia Czuszyńska;Zbigniew Zdrojewski
Vol. 52 , No. 3 , pp. 207-212
265 views DOI Abstract
View All 28 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.