brazilian journal of biology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8223 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

brazilian journal of biology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name brazilian journal of biology
Abbreviated Name brazilian journal of biology
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (69 total)

0000
Genetic variability and social structure of colonies in Acromyrmex heyeri and A. striatus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
DIEHI, E.;ARAÚJO, A. M. de;CAVALLI-MOLINA, S.;
Vol. 61 , No. 4 , pp. 667-678
374 views Abstract
0000
Impacts of artificial reservoirs on floristic diversity and plant functional traits in dry forests after 15 years
Lopes, SF;Vale, VS;Júnior, JA Prado;Schiavini, I;
Vol. 75 , No. 3 , pp. 548-557
363 views Abstract
0000
Histopathological alterations observed in the liver of Poecilia vivipara (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae) as a tool for the environmental quality assessment of the Cachoeira River, BA
Paulo, DV;Fontes, FM;Flores-Lopes, F;
Vol. 72 , No. 1 , pp. 131-140
360 views Abstract
2012
professor de ensino superior: o entendimento a partir de narrativas de pós-graduandos em química teacher of higher education: the view from the narratives of graduate students in chemistry
;Ana Luiza de Quadros;Dayse Carvalho da Silva;Fernando César Silva;Gilson de Freitas Silva;Sheila Rodrigues Oliveira;Frank Pereira de Andrade;Juliana Cristina Tristão;Leandro José Santos;Helga Gabriela Aleme
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 389-402
344 views DOI Abstract
2004
estudos quantitativos em educação quantitative studies in education
;Bernardete A. Gatti
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 11-30
338 views DOI Abstract
0000
Recurrent blooms of Heterosigma akashiwo (Raphidophyceae) in the Piraquê Channel, Rodrigo de Freitas Lagoon, southeast Brazil
Branco, S;Menezes, M;Alves-de-Souza, C;Domingos, P;Schramm, MA;Proença, LAO;
Vol. 74 , No. 3 , pp. 529-537
327 views Abstract
escolarização das pessoas com deficiência no rio grande do sul ante o direito à educação
;Clarissa Haas;Mayara Costa da Silva;Alceu Ravanello Ferraro
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 245-262
325 views DOI Abstract
2012
agroecologia, consumo sustentável e aprendizado coletivo no brasil agroecology, sustainable consumption and collective learning in brazil
;Fernando Passos dos Santos;Leila Chalub-Martins
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 469-484
295 views Abstract
2012
dialogue, agency and experiential learning in international camps diálogo, agência e aprendizagem experencial em acampamentos internacionais
;Claudio Baraldi
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 419-436
289 views Abstract
ocio y usos del tiempo libre en adolescentes de 12 a 16 años en españa
;Laura Varela Crespo;Rita Gradaílle Pernas;Yésica Teijeiro Bóo
Vol. 42 , No. 4 , pp. 987-999
283 views DOI Abstract
View All 69 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.