Indexed in Journament

jurnal pengajaran mipa

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #22,253 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 24.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name jurnal pengajaran mipa
Abbreviated Name jurnal pengajaran mipa
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 40.5
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 67.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for jurnal pengajaran mipa
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 40.5 31.2
Community Impact 4.3 13.4
Content Distribution 67.1 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2016
critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 341-356
298 views Abstract
2017
2015
high-flow bypass and wrap-clipping for ruptured blood blister-like aneurysm of the internal carotid artery using intraoperative monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 297-302
264 views Abstract
2016
biomarkers and the prediction of atrial fibrillation: state of the art
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 297-303
255 views Abstract
2011
skeletonized coronary arteries: pathophysiological and clinical aspects of vascular calcification
Vol. Volume 7 , pp. 143-151
255 views Abstract
2008
habitual coffee consumption and blood pressure: an epidemiological perspective
Vol. Volume 4 , pp. 963-970
255 views Abstract
2014
defining risks and predicting adverse events after lower extremity bypass for critical limb ischemia
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 367-374
243 views Abstract
2012
endotoxin-induced and vaccine-induced systemic inflammation both impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation, but not pulse wave reflection
Vol. 2012 , No. default , pp. 447-453
241 views Abstract
2016
pcsk9 inhibition in the management of hyperlipidemia: focus on evolocumab
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 185-197
236 views Abstract
2017
2016
pcsk9 inhibition in the management of hyperlipidemia: focus on evolocumab
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 185-197
236 views Abstract
2016
biomarkers and the prediction of atrial fibrillation: state of the art
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 297-303
255 views Abstract
2016
critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 341-356
298 views Abstract
2015
nonvitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants (noacs): the tide continues to come in
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 489-492
195 views Abstract
2015
preseason preparation training and endothelial function in elite professional soccer players
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 595-599
141 views Abstract
2015
adherence to guideline-recommended therapies among patients with diverse manifestations of vascular disease
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 185-193
65 views Abstract
2015
high-flow bypass and wrap-clipping for ruptured blood blister-like aneurysm of the internal carotid artery using intraoperative monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 297-302
264 views Abstract
Journament Score
30.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #22,253 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

30.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.