Indexed in Journament

npg asia materials

ISSN 1884-4049· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,689 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
55 Articles
Scores higher than 15.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nom Abrégé npg asia materials
Nom Abrégé npg asia materials
ISSN 1884-4049
URL https://www.nature.com/am

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for npg asia materials
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 5.6 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 5.0 11.5
Content Distribution 65.7 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (55)

2016
prevalence and covariates of polypharmacy in elderly patients on discharge from a tertiary care hospital in oman
Vol. 31 , No. 6 , pp. 421-425
486 views DOI Abstract
2013
side effects of deferasirox iron chelation in patients with beta thalassemia major or intermedia
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 121-124
459 views Abstract
2014
effect of multivitamin-mineral versus multivitamin supplementation on maternal, newborns' biochemical indicators and birth size: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 123-129
440 views DOI Abstract
2013
clinical characteristics and causality of eye lid laceration in iran
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 97-101
426 views Abstract
2013
informed consent in adult psychiatry
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 228-231
373 views DOI Abstract
2013
any variation existing in pathways inducing hyperlipidemia in experimental animal models and in real humans may cause difference in treatment success
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 75-75
357 views
2013
maternal perceptions of antenatal care provision at a tertiary level hospital, riyadh
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 33-35
342 views Abstract
2017
hypocalcemia associated with subcutaneous fat necrosis of the newborn: case report and literature review
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. 518-521
326 views DOI Abstract
2018
combined factor v and viii deficiency
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 268-268
29 views DOI
2018
Block copolymer structural color strain sensor
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 328-339
227 views Abstract
2017
the surgical safety checklist: results of implementation in otorhinolaryngology
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 27-30
256 views DOI Abstract
2017
case report oman medical journal [2017], vol. 32, no. 1: 62–65 imported case of melioidosis in oman: case report
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 62-65
264 views DOI Abstract
2017
feminizing adrenocortical carcinoma without gynecomastia
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 349-351
132 views DOI Abstract
2017
antifungal effect of malaysian aloe vera leaf extract on selected fungal species of pathogenic otomycosis species in in vitro culture medium
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 41-46
290 views DOI Abstract
2017
hypocalcemia associated with subcutaneous fat necrosis of the newborn: case report and literature review
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. 518-521
326 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,689 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.