Indexed in Journament

the milbank quarterly

ISSN 1468-0009· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0/100
Journament Score
#9,980
Journament Rank
12
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name milbank q
Abbreviated Name milbank q
ISSN 1468-0009

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (12)

2008
"Developing good taste in evidence": facilitators of and hindrances to evidence-informed health policymaking in state government
Jewell CJ;Bero LA;;
Vol. 86 , No. 2 , pp. -
385 views Abstract
2019
Toward a Corporate Culture of Health: Results of a National Survey.
Kyle, Michael Anne;Seegars, Lumumba;Benson, John M;Blendon, Robert J;Huckman, Robert S;Singer, Sara J;
370 views DOI Abstract
2007
Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature
Mitton C;Adair CE;McKenzie E;Patten SB;Waye Perry B;;
Vol. 85 , No. 4 , pp. -
356 views Abstract
2011
Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers
Haynes AS;Gillespie JA;Derrick GE;Hall WD;Redman S;Chapman S;Sturk H;;
Vol. 89 , No. 4 , pp. -
344 views Abstract
2019
Culture, Race, and Health: Implications for Racial Inequities and Population Health.
Cogburn, Courtney D;
Vol. 97 , No. 3 , pp. 736-761
332 views DOI Abstract
2009
Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method
Greenhalgh T;Potts HW;Wong G;Bark P;Swinglehurst D;;
Vol. 87 , No. 4 , pp. -
299 views Abstract
2008
“Developing Good Taste in Evidence”: Facilitators of and Hindrances to Evidence-Informed Health Policymaking in State Government
Christopher J Jewell, Lisa A Bero;Christopher J Jewell;Lisa A Bero;
Vol. 86 , No. 2 , pp. 177-
277 views DOI Abstract
2020
Equity First: Conceptualizing a Normative Framework to Assess the Role of Preemption in Public Health.
Carr, Derek;Adler, Sabrina;Winig, Benjamin D;Montez, Jennifer Karas;
274 views DOI Abstract
2011
Galvanizers, Guides, Champions, and Shields: The Many Ways That Policymakers Use Public Health Researchers
Abby S Haynes, James A Gillespie, Gemma E Derrick, Wayne D Hall, Sally Redman, Simon Chapman, Heidi Sturk;Abby S Haynes;James A Gillespie;Gemma E Derrick;Wayne D Hall;Sally Redman;Simon Chapman;Heidi Sturk;
Vol. 89 , No. 4 , pp. 564-
268 views DOI Abstract
2010
On the choice of absolute or relative inequality measures
Asada Y;;
Vol. 88 , No. 4 , pp. -
230 views Abstract
2020
Equity First: Conceptualizing a Normative Framework to Assess the Role of Preemption in Public Health.
Carr, Derek;Adler, Sabrina;Winig, Benjamin D;Montez, Jennifer Karas;
274 views DOI Abstract
2019
Culture, Race, and Health: Implications for Racial Inequities and Population Health.
Cogburn, Courtney D;
Vol. 97 , No. 3 , pp. 736-761
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Toward a Corporate Culture of Health: Results of a National Survey.
Kyle, Michael Anne;Seegars, Lumumba;Benson, John M;Blendon, Robert J;Huckman, Robert S;Singer, Sara J;
370 views DOI Abstract
2011
Maximizing the Impact of Systematic Reviews in Health Care Decision Making: A Systematic Scoping Review of Knowledge-Translation Resources
Duncan Chambers, Paul M Wilson, Carl A Thompson, Andria Hanbury, Katherine Farley, Kate Light;Duncan Chambers;Paul M Wilson;Carl A Thompson;Andria Hanbury;Katherine Farley;Kate Light;
Vol. 89 , No. 1 , pp. 131-
162 views DOI Abstract
2011
Galvanizers, Guides, Champions, and Shields: The Many Ways That Policymakers Use Public Health Researchers
Abby S Haynes, James A Gillespie, Gemma E Derrick, Wayne D Hall, Sally Redman, Simon Chapman, Heidi Sturk;Abby S Haynes;James A Gillespie;Gemma E Derrick;Wayne D Hall;Sally Redman;Simon Chapman;Heidi Sturk;
Vol. 89 , No. 4 , pp. 564-
268 views DOI Abstract
2011
Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers
Haynes AS;Gillespie JA;Derrick GE;Hall WD;Redman S;Chapman S;Sturk H;;
Vol. 89 , No. 4 , pp. -
344 views Abstract
2010
On the choice of absolute or relative inequality measures
Asada Y;;
Vol. 88 , No. 4 , pp. -
230 views Abstract
2009
Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method
Greenhalgh T;Potts HW;Wong G;Bark P;Swinglehurst D;;
Vol. 87 , No. 4 , pp. -
299 views Abstract
2008
“Developing Good Taste in Evidence”: Facilitators of and Hindrances to Evidence-Informed Health Policymaking in State Government
Christopher J Jewell, Lisa A Bero;Christopher J Jewell;Lisa A Bero;
Vol. 86 , No. 2 , pp. 177-
277 views DOI Abstract
2008
"Developing good taste in evidence": facilitators of and hindrances to evidence-informed health policymaking in state government
Jewell CJ;Bero LA;;
Vol. 86 , No. 2 , pp. -
385 views Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.