catalysts | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1354 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

catalysts

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name catalysts
Abbreviated Name catalysts
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2018
Acetic Acid/Propionic Acid Conversion on Metal Doped Molybdenum Carbide Catalyst Beads for Catalytic Hot Gas Filtration
Lu, Mi;Lepore, Andrew W.;Choi, Jae-Soon;Li, Zhenglong;Wu, Zili;Polo-Garzon, Felipe;Hu, Michael Z.;
Vol. 8 , No. 12 , pp. 643-
503 views Abstract
2019
Biocatalyzed Synthesis of Statins: A Sustainable Strategy for the Preparation of Valuable Drugs
Hoyos, Pilar;Pace, Vittorio;Alcántara, Andrés R.;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 260-
447 views Abstract
2020
Carbonaceous Nanomaterials Employed in the Development of Electrochemical Sensors Based on Screen-Printing Technique—A Review
Alexandra Virginia Bounegru;Constantin Apetrei;Bounegru, Alexandra Virginia;Apetrei, Constantin;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. 680-
417 views DOI Abstract
2018
Structural Evolution of Highly Active Multicomponent Catalysts for Selective Propylene Oxidation
Sprenger, Paul;Sheppard, Thomas L;Suuronen, Jussi-Petteri;Gaur, Abhijeet;Benzi, Federico;Grunwaldt, Jan-Dierk;
Vol. 8 , No. 9 , pp. 356-
394 views Abstract
2019
Shapes control of Bi<inf>2</inf>Wo<inf>6</inf> Nano-structures as photo-fenton catalysts for pulping wastewater treatment
Ran, M.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
378 views DOI
2019
Methane and Ethane Steam Reforming over MgAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Supported Rh and Ir Catalysts: Catalytic Implications for Natural Gas Reforming Application
Lopez, Johnny Saavedra;Dagle, Vanessa Lebarbier;Deshmane, Chinmay A.;Kovarik, Libor;Wegeng, Robert S.;Dagle, Robert A.;
Vol. 9 , No. 10 , pp. 801-
367 views Abstract
2019
Investigation of Thermal Stability and Reactivity of Rh Nanoclusters on an Ultrathin Alumina Film
Liao, Zhen-He;Hsu, Po-Wei;Hung, Ting-Chieh;Liao, Guan-Jr;Chern, Zhao-Ying;Lai, Yu-Ling;Yu, Li-Chung;Hsu, Yao-Jane;Wang, Jeng-Han;Chen, Peilong;Luo, Meng-Fan;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. 971-
361 views Abstract
2019
Ni/CeO<inf>2</inf> structured catalysts for solar reforming of spent solvents
Landi, G.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2015
Recent Advances on Electro-Oxidation of Ethanol on Pt- and Pd-Based Catalysts: From Reaction Mechanisms to Catalytic Materials
Ye Wang;Shouzhong Zou;Wen-Bin Cai;Wang, Ye;Zou, Shouzhong;Cai, Wen-Bin;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 1507-1534
338 views DOI Abstract
2017
Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Supported on Macro-Mesoporous Aluminosilicates for Catalytic Steam Gasification of Heavy Oil Fractions for On-Site Upgrading
López, Daniel;Giraldo, Lady J.;Salazar, Juan P.;Zapata, Dioni M.;Ortega, Diana C.;Franco, Camilo A.;Cortés, Farid B.;
Vol. 7 , No. 11 , pp. 319-
328 views Abstract
View All 29 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.