Indexed in Journament

qjm : monthly journal of the association of physicians

ISSN 1460-2393· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,766 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
116 Articles
Scores higher than 73.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name qjm
Abbreviated Name qjm
ISSN 1460-2393

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.3
Accessibility 15.0 18.3
Timeliness 100.0 12.6
Diversity 30.0 27.3
Innovation 40.0 28.9
Community Impact 34.5 9.7
Content Distribution 14.8 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (116)

1996
CD4 and total lymphocyte counts as predictors of HIV disease progression
Post FA;Wood R;Maartens G;;
Vol. 89 , No. 7 , pp. -
401 views Abstract
2020
Combined treatment of tocilizumab and chloroquine on severe COVID-19: a case report.
Xu, Chun-Yang;Lu, Sheng-Dong;Ye, Xun;Cao, Meng-Yi;Xu, Gui-Dong;Yu, Qiang;Qian, Jin-Xian;Zeng, Gang;
397 views DOI
2019
The centenary of the WW1 Armistice: the dividend from an incalculable loss.
Harbison, J;
Vol. 112 , No. 3 , pp. 169-170
382 views DOI
2019
Response to letter of Dr Jolobe entitled Paradoxical embolism as a cause of renal and/or splenic infarction Manuscripts submitted to QJM (ref 123456789).
Weber, E;Lega, J C;
336 views DOI
2016
The clinical, occupational and financial outcomes associated with a bespoke specialist clinic for military aircrew-a cohort study.
Pavitt, A J;Pavitt, C W;Harron, K;Jones, M;Timperley, A C;Reid, A N C;Mcloughlin, D;d'Arcy, J;Nicol, E D;
Vol. 109 , No. 5 , pp. 309-17
269 views DOI Abstract
2003
The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria: simple and accurate diagnostic decision rules for serotonin toxicity
E.J.C. Dunkley, Geoffrey K. Isbister, David Sibbritt, Andrew H. Dawson, Ian M. Whyte
54 views DOI Abstract
2020
The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population
Gianluca Serafini, B Parmigiani, Andrea Amerio, Andrea Aguglia, Leo Sher, Mario Amore
52 views DOI Abstract
2020
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide rates
Leo Sher
50 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mental health in the COVID-19 pandemic
Walter Cullen, G. Mitu Gulati, Brendan D. Kelly
50 views DOI
2009
Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
J. K. Dowman, Jeremy Tomlinson, Philip N. Newsome
45 views DOI Abstract
2026
Interferon Gamma Release Assay testing and TNF antagonists; mind the window period
Ammar Janjua, B Keane, Lorraine Dolan, A.I.G. Mclaughlin, Joseph Keane
DOI Abstract
2026
Bubble-Wrapped: An Unusual Developmental Cataract
Akanksha Sharma, Parul Chawla Gupta, Ranjan Kumar Behera
DOI Abstract
2026
Translating evolutionary history and protein-focused machine learning supports increased prevalence of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia, one of the most common inherited disorders
Adriana Macko, Jill Pecon‐Slattery, Claire L. Shovlin
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Lytic bone lesions in a patient diagnosed with breast cancer – Sarcoidosis
Ami Schattner, Ina Dubin, Yaïr Glick, Vladimir Kravtsov
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Lung cancer disparities: infrastructure, not just eligibility, drives the global gap
Esteban Cardenas-Duran, Hefziba Lorences-Noguera, Carlos Alejandro Gomez-Anguiano
11 views DOI
2026
Schaumann Bodies : A Histopathological Clue To Sarcoidosis
Bodhibrata Banerjee, A S Sengupta, Uma Nahar Saikia, Sanjay Jain, ShefaliKhanna Sharma
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Comparative Risk of Respiratory Virus Infections Among Patients with Asthma Treated with Biologic Therapies
Kuang‐Ming Liao, Sheng Chi Huang, I-Ha Lao, Chia-Yu Kuo, Wan‐Hsuan Hsu, Jheng-Yan Wu, Chih-Cheng Lai
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Capsular Sunburst: Late Anterior Capsular Phimosis in Fuchs Uveitis Syndrome
Anchal Gera, Avishi Agrawal, Sonam Yangzes
8 views DOI
2026
Dual-pattern direct immunofluorescence in bullous systemic lupus erythematosus
Yanyan Zhu, Yanting Liu, Songmei Geng, Bin Peng
9 views DOI
2026
Photopenic PET in toxoplasmosis
Nitin Gupta, Sumeet Suresh Malapure, Muralidhar Varma, Praveen Kumar Tirlangi
8 views DOI
Journament Score
37.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,766 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

14.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.