Indexed in Journament

the european physical journal c, particles and fields

ISSN 1434-6044· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #3,885 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 86.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur phys j c part fields
Abbreviated Name eur phys j c part fields
ISSN 1434-6044

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the european physical journal c, particles and fields
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.5 30.4
Accessibility 15.0 19.1
Timeliness 50.0 9.2
Diversity 30.0 25.8
Innovation 40.0 27.4
Community Impact 35.0 7.8
Content Distribution 81.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2019
Measurement of exclusive  photoproduction in ultraperipheral pPb collisions at .
Vol. 79 , No. 8 , pp. 702
408 views DOI Abstract
2020
Searches for physics beyond the standard model with the variable in hadronic final states with and without disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at .
Vol. 80 , No. 1 , pp. 3
390 views DOI Abstract
Two-particle Bose-Einstein correlations in collisions at [Formula: see text] 0.9 and 7 TeV measured with the ATLAS detector.
Vol. 75 , No. 10 , pp. 466
390 views Abstract
2020
Jet cross sections at the LHC and the quest for higher precision.
Vol. 80 , No. 2 , pp. 93
376 views DOI Abstract
Measurement of three-jet production cross-sections in [Formula: see text] collisions at 7 [Formula: see text] centre-of-mass energy using the ATLAS detector.
Vol. 75 , No. 5 , pp. 228
359 views Abstract
2017
A Sommerfeld toolbox for colored dark sectors.
Vol. 77 , No. 9 , pp. 622
348 views DOI Abstract
Jet energy measurement and its systematic uncertainty in proton-proton collisions at [Formula: see text] TeV with the ATLAS detector.
Vol. 75 , pp. 17
340 views Abstract
2017
ALPs effective field theory and collider signatures.
Vol. 77 , No. 8 , pp. 572
319 views DOI Abstract
Search for [Formula: see text] decays in [Formula: see text] collisions at [Formula: see text] = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector.
Vol. 75 , No. 4 , pp. 165
314 views Abstract
2017
Status of the scalar singlet dark matter model.
Vol. 77 , No. 8 , pp. 568
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Jet cross sections at the LHC and the quest for higher precision.
Vol. 80 , No. 2 , pp. 93
376 views DOI Abstract
2020
Searches for physics beyond the standard model with the variable in hadronic final states with and without disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at .
Vol. 80 , No. 1 , pp. 3
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measurement of exclusive  photoproduction in ultraperipheral pPb collisions at .
Vol. 79 , No. 8 , pp. 702
408 views DOI Abstract
2017
Status of the scalar singlet dark matter model.
Vol. 77 , No. 8 , pp. 568
313 views DOI Abstract
2017
ALPs effective field theory and collider signatures.
Vol. 77 , No. 8 , pp. 572
319 views DOI Abstract
2017
Local conformal symmetry in non-Riemannian geometry and the origin of physical scales.
Vol. 77 , No. 9 , pp. 605
302 views DOI Abstract
2017
A Sommerfeld toolbox for colored dark sectors.
Vol. 77 , No. 9 , pp. 622
348 views DOI Abstract
2015
air pollutant mapping with a mobile laboratory during the bee-tex field study
Vol. 2015 , No. Suppl. 4 , pp. 7-13
120 views
Measurements of the [Formula: see text] production cross sections in association with jets with the ATLAS detector.
Vol. 75 , No. 2 , pp. 82
251 views Abstract
Performance of the ATLAS muon trigger in pp collisions at [Formula: see text] TeV.
Vol. 75 , No. 3 , pp. 120
213 views Abstract
Journament Score
40.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #3,885 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.