international journal of algebra and computation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7331 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

international journal of algebra and computation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name international journal of algebra and computation
Abbreviated Name international journal of algebra and computation
ISSN 0218-1967
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.worldscinet.com/ijac/ijac.shtml
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2015
bars curve in romanian economy
;Emilian Dobrescu
Vol. 17 , No. 39 , pp. 693-705
365 views Abstract
2013
erp implementation and organizational performance. a romanian case study of best practices
;Valentin Florentin Dumitru;Nadia Albu;Cătălin Nicolae Albu; Mădălina Dumitru
Vol. 15 , No. 34 , pp. 518-531
324 views Abstract
2017
an assessment of the first round impact of innovation industries on europe’s regional economies
;Adrian Oţoiu;Ramona Bere ;Cătălin Silvestru
Vol. 19 , No. 44 , pp. 289-301
294 views Abstract
2017
the dangers of dispersal of responsibilities
;Adriana Schiopoiu Burlea ;Joop Remmé
Vol. 19 , No. 45 , pp. 464-476
286 views Abstract
2013
buyer behaviour in the context of sustainable consumption policy pursued in poland
;Jaroslaw Korpysa
Vol. 15 , No. Special Issue 7 , pp. 702-713
278 views Abstract
2019
Uncountable groups in which normality is a transitive relation
De, Falco M.
Vol. 29 , pp. 627-638
251 views DOI
2012
sustainability and organizational change by sustainable crediting therapy
;Dragoş Ilie
Vol. 14 , No. 32 , pp. 393-403
236 views Abstract
2018
the direct and indirect impact of pharmaceutical industry in economic expansion and job creation: evidence from bootstrapping and normal theory methods
;Rizwan Raheem Ahmed;Jolita Vveinhardt;Dalia Streimikiene
Vol. 20 , No. 48 , pp. 454 -469
222 views DOI Abstract
2015
entrepreneurship in sme segment: case study from the czech republic and slovakia
;Jaroslav Belás;Yuriy Bilan;Valér Demjan ;Juraj Sipko
Vol. 17 , No. 38 , pp. 308-326
217 views Abstract
2016
the constraints to the economic development in the former socialist eu countries from the central and eastern europe
;Vasile Dinu
Vol. 18 , No. 43 , pp. 499-500
207 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.