Indexed in Journament

journal of nuclear cardiology

ISSN 1071-3581· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,057 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
63 Articles
Scores higher than 45.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of nuclear cardiology
Abbreviated Name journal of nuclear cardiology
ISSN 1071-3581

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 31.5
Innovation 61.5
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 56.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 31.5 25.8
Innovation 61.5 27.4
Community Impact 4.3 7.8
Content Distribution 56.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (63)

2019
Cardiovascular disease in the literature: A selection of recent original research papers
AlJaroudi, W.
Vol. 26 , pp. 701-703
388 views DOI
2014
sexually transmitted infections in women: a correlation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis in cases of vaginal discharge syndrome
;Vidyalaxmi Chauhan;Maitri Shah;Sejal Thakkar;Sangita V Patel;Yogesh Marfatia
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 1-5
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nuclear cardiology in the literature: A selection of recent, original research papers
Malhotra, S.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1054-1055
330 views DOI
2015
a lady presenting with segmental anhidrosis and heat intolerance
;Piyush Kumar;Anupam Das;Ashim K Mondal;Jayant Kumar;Saumya Swarup Chattopadhyay;Gautam Guha;Nilay K Das
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 126-127
320 views DOI
2016
laryngeal involvement with fatal outcome in progressive nodular histiocytosis: a rare case report
;Aarti Salunke;Vasudha Belgaumkar;Ravindranath Chavan;Rinkesh Dobariya
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. 516-519
303 views DOI Abstract
2015
cutaneous metastasis in anorectal adenocarcinoma
;Krishnendra Varma;Ujjwal Kumar Singh;Mansi Jain;P L Dhand
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 213-216
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Automatic evaluation of myocardial perfusion on SPECT: Need for “Normality”
Liga, R.
Vol. 26 , pp. 786-789
285 views DOI
2019
Relationships between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block and healthy controls
Sillanmäki, S.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1228-1239
285 views DOI
2013
coexistence of lip-tip vitiligo and disseminated discoid lupus erythematosus with hypothyroidism: need for careful therapeutic approach
;Sudhanshu Sharma;Rashmi Sarkar;Vijay Kumar Garg;Suchi Bansal
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 112-114
282 views DOI Abstract
2016
necrotizing fasciitis associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in a child
;Sahana M Srinivas;Alkarani T Patil;Gowri Shankar;Keshavmurthy M Lakshmikantha;Munirathnam Govindraj
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 319-319
270 views DOI
2019
Neuronal damage and abnormal contraction: Is the circle of synchronicity complete?
Marcassa, C.
Vol. 26 , pp. 880-882
181 views DOI
2019
Relationships between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block and healthy controls
Sillanmäki, S.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1228-1239
285 views DOI
2019
FDG PET-CT findings of extra-thoracic sarcoid are associated with cardiac sarcoid: A rationale for using FGD PET-CT for cardiac sarcoid evaluation
Patel, D.
Vol. 26 , pp. 486-492
190 views DOI
2019
Cardiovascular disease in the literature: A selection of recent original research papers
AlJaroudi, W.
Vol. 26 , pp. 701-703
388 views DOI
2019
Nuclear cardiology in the literature: A selection of recent, original research papers
Malhotra, S.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1054-1055
330 views DOI
2019
Automatic evaluation of myocardial perfusion on SPECT: Need for “Normality”
Liga, R.
Vol. 26 , pp. 786-789
285 views DOI
2018
familial case of darier disease with guttate leukoderma: a case series from india
;Naveen Kumar Kansal;Neirita Hazarika;Shalinee Rao
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 62-63
28 views DOI
2018
dermoscopy of angiokeratoma
;Abhijeet K Jha;Sidharth Sonthalia;Deepak Jakhar
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 141-142
104 views DOI
2018
relationship between disease activity and helicobacter pylori infection in patients with vitiligo
;Ola Ahmed Bakry;Mohamed Basha;Sally El Hefnawy;Shaimaa Mekkawy
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 59-61
132 views DOI
2018
skinindia quiz 45: asymptomatic nodular lesion over the neck in an old woman
;Suman Patra;Sanjay Singh;Neetu Bhari
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 214-215
107 views DOI
Journament Score
32.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,057 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

31.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

61.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

56.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.