journal of nuclear cardiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1193 / 33,934
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated há 4 dias

journal of nuclear cardiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexacoes
scopus ulakbim sci
Nome Abreviado journal of nuclear cardiology
Nome Abreviado journal of nuclear cardiology
ISSN 1071-3581
Objetivo e Escopo
URL
Instrucoes para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (63 total)

2019
Cardiovascular disease in the literature: A selection of recent original research papers
AlJaroudi, W.
Vol. 26 , pp. 701-703
341 views DOI
2019
Nuclear cardiology in the literature: A selection of recent, original research papers
Malhotra, S.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1054-1055
280 views DOI
2014
sexually transmitted infections in women: a correlation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis in cases of vaginal discharge syndrome
;Vidyalaxmi Chauhan;Maitri Shah;Sejal Thakkar;Sangita V Patel;Yogesh Marfatia
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 1-5
258 views DOI Abstract
2019
Automatic evaluation of myocardial perfusion on SPECT: Need for “Normality”
Liga, R.
Vol. 26 , pp. 786-789
255 views DOI
2015
a lady presenting with segmental anhidrosis and heat intolerance
;Piyush Kumar;Anupam Das;Ashim K Mondal;Jayant Kumar;Saumya Swarup Chattopadhyay;Gautam Guha;Nilay K Das
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 126-127
255 views DOI
2016
laryngeal involvement with fatal outcome in progressive nodular histiocytosis: a rare case report
;Aarti Salunke;Vasudha Belgaumkar;Ravindranath Chavan;Rinkesh Dobariya
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. 516-519
246 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationships between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block and healthy controls
Sillanmäki, S.
Vol. 26 , pp. 1228-1239
225 views DOI
2013
coexistence of lip-tip vitiligo and disseminated discoid lupus erythematosus with hypothyroidism: need for careful therapeutic approach
;Sudhanshu Sharma;Rashmi Sarkar;Vijay Kumar Garg;Suchi Bansal
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 112-114
224 views DOI Abstract
2016
necrotizing fasciitis associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in a child
;Sahana M Srinivas;Alkarani T Patil;Gowri Shankar;Keshavmurthy M Lakshmikantha;Munirathnam Govindraj
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 319-319
217 views DOI
2015
cutaneous metastasis in anorectal adenocarcinoma
;Krishnendra Varma;Ujjwal Kumar Singh;Mansi Jain;P L Dhand
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 213-216
216 views DOI Abstract
View All 63 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.