sexuality and culture | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1947 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

sexuality and culture

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name sexuality and culture
Abbreviated Name sexuality and culture
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/12119
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (53 total)

2009
a survey for assessment of the role of pharmacist in community pharmacy services
;H Sharma;D Jindal;M Aqil;M S Alam;S Karim;P Kapur
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 23-26
448 views DOI Abstract
2013
synthesis and biological evaluation of di- and tri-substituted imidazoles as safer anti-inflammatory-antifungal agents
;Asif Husain;Sushma Drabu;Nitin Kumar;M M Alam;Sandhya Bawa
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 154-161
432 views DOI Abstract
2016
thymol, a monoterpene, inhibits aldose reductase and high-glucose-induced cataract on isolated goat lens
;Divya M Kanchan;Smita S Kale;Gauresh S Somani;Aakruti A Kaikini;Sadhana Sathaye
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 277-283
385 views DOI Abstract
2018
a survey on human t-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (htlv-1) and xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (xmrv) coinfection in tehran, iran
;Mohsen Keshavarz;Mohammad Hadi Karbalaie Niya;Fahimeh Safarnezhad Tameshkel;Amir Sasan Mozaffari Nejad;Seyed Hamidreza Monavari;Hossein Keyvani
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 166-171
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Destruction of the Heterosexual Family? The Discourse of Opponents of the Gender Mainstreaming Educational Curriculum in Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Rohde-Abuba, C.
Vol. 23 , pp. 718-736
334 views DOI
2014
patient compliance and supportive periodontal therapy: study among young adults of namakkal district
;Subramanium Gokulanathan;Natarajan Balan;Ramaraj Jayabalan Aravind;Kavin Thangavelu
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 171-173
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Challenging Accepted Scripts of Sexual “Normality”: Asexual Narratives of Non-normative Identity and Experience
Mitchell, H.
Vol. 23 , pp. 507-524
292 views DOI
2012
evaluative comparison of systemic aspirin therapy effects on gingival bleeding in post non-surgical periodontal therapy individuals
;Elanchezhiyan Sundram;Panishankar Kharaharilal;Sugumari Ilavarasu;Renukadevi;Esther Nalini;Venilla Karunamoorthy
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. 221-225
286 views DOI Abstract
2014
coconut water assisted green synthesis of silver nanoparticles
;Erusan Kuppan Elumalai;Karuppsamy Kayalvizhi;Simon Silvan
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 241-245
281 views DOI Abstract
2017
moisture sorption–desorption characteristics and the corresponding thermodynamic properties of carvedilol phosphate
;Ravikiran Allada;Arthanareeswari Maruthapillai;Kamaraj Palanisamy;Praveen Chappa
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 16-21
278 views DOI Abstract
View All 53 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.