Symmetry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1173 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Symmetry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name Symmetry
Abbreviated Name symmetry
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (145 total)

2018
Background Augmentation Generative Adversarial Networks (BAGANs): Effective Data Generation Based on GAN-Augmented 3D Synthesizing
Ma, Yan;Liu, Kang;Guan, Zhibin;Xu, Xinkai;Qian, Xu;Bao, Hong;
Vol. 10 , No. 12 , pp. 734-
465 views Abstract
2002
developing guidelines for the protection of older people in humanitarian emergencies
;V Vijayakumar
, No. 14 , pp. 14-
440 views Abstract
2016
Cloud-Based Parameter-Driven Statistical Services and Resource Allocation in a Heterogeneous Platform on Enterprise Environment
Lee, Sungju;Jeong, Taikyeong;
Vol. 8 , No. 10 , pp. 103-
426 views Abstract
2019
Ranking of normality tests: An appraisal through skewed alternative space
Ul, Islam T.
Vol. 11 , pp. 0-0
412 views DOI
2019
Histological Evaluation of a New Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate/Hydroxyapatite/Poly (1-Lactide-Co-Caprolactone) Composite Biomaterial in the Inflammatory Process and Repair of Critical Bone Defects
Martinez, Elizabeth Ferreira;Rodrigues, Ana Elisa Amaro;Teixeira, Lucas Novaes;Esposito, Andrea Rodrigues;Cabrera, Walter Israel Rojas;Demasi, Ana Paula Dias;Passador-Santos, Fabricio;
Vol. 11 , No. 11 , pp. 1356-
387 views Abstract
2019
IoT and Its Impact on the Electronics Market: A Powerful Decision Support System for Helping Customers in Choosing the Best Product
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed;Mohamed, Mai;Chang, Victor;Smarandache, Florentin;
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 611-
383 views Abstract
2019
Methods for Multiple-Attribute Group Decision Making with q-Rung Interval-Valued Orthopair Fuzzy Information and Their Applications to the Selection of Green Suppliers
Wang, Jie;Gao, Hui;Wei, Guiwu;Wei, Yu;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 56-
383 views Abstract
2016
Hybrid Data Hiding Scheme Using Right-Most Digit Replacement and Adaptive Least Significant Bit for Digital Images
Hussain, Mehdi;Wahab, Ainuddin Wahid Abdul;Javed, Noman;Jung, Ki-Hyun;
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 41-
366 views Abstract
2019
Evaluating and Prioritizing the Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Pakistan: Based on Delphi and Fuzzy AHP Approach
Zhou, Yuanyuan;Xu, Li;Shaikh, Ghulam Muhammad;
Vol. 11 , No. 11 , pp. 1346-
362 views Abstract
2019
Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Water Entry Impact Forces of an Airborne-Launched, Axisymmetric, Disk-Type Autonomous Underwater Hovering Vehicle
Chen, Chen-Wei;Lu, Yi-Fan;
Vol. 11 , No. 9 , pp. 1100-
360 views Abstract
View All 145 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.