journal of assisted reproduction and genetics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2534 / 33,944
📉 Poor
Overall Score
33.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of assisted reproduction and genetics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j assist reprod genet
Abbreviated Name journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN 1573-7330
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/10815
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (66 total)

2019
Counseling young women with early breast cancer on fertility preservation.
Ter Welle-Butalid, M E Elena;Vriens, I J H Ingeborg;Derhaag, J G Josien;Leter, E M Edward;de Die-Smulders, C E Christine;Smidt, M Marjolein;van Golde, R J T Ron;Tjan-Heijnen, V C G Vivianne;
Vol. 36 , No. 12 , pp. 2593-2604
485 views DOI Abstract
2019
DNA fragmentation in concert with the simultaneous assessment of cell viability in a subfertile population: establishing thresholds of normality both before and after density gradient centrifugation
Punjabi, U.
Vol. 36 , pp. 1413-1421
374 views DOI
2019
ICSI does not offer any benefit over conventional IVF across different ovarian response categories in non-male factor infertility: a European multicenter analysis.
Drakopoulos, Panagiotis;Garcia-Velasco, Juan;Bosch, Ernesto;Blockeel, Christophe;de Vos, Michel;Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel;Makrigiannakis, Antonis;Tournaye, Herman;Polyzos, Nikolaos P;
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
When next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) yields an inconclusive report: diagnostic results and clinical outcomes after re biopsy.
Neal, Shelby A;Sun, L;Jalas, C;Morin, S J;Molinaro, T A;Scott, R T;
Vol. 36 , pp. 2103-2109
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Human β-defensin 1 in follicular fluid and semen: impact on fertility.
Zupin, Luisa;Polesello, Vania;Martinelli, Monica;Luppi, Stefania;Giolo, Elena;Zito, Gabriella;Romano, Federico;Segat, Ludovica;Crovella, Sergio;Ricci, Giuseppe;
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. 787-797
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Double intrauterine insemination (IUI) of no benefit over single IUI among lesbian and single women seeking to conceive.
Monseur, Brent C;Franasiak, Jason M;Sun, Li;Scott, Richard T;Kaser, Daniel J;
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Can follicular Emmprin and BMP 4 levels predict ICSI outcome?
Takmaz, Ozguc;Yozgatli, Dilara;Ozaltin, Selin;Ozbasli, Esra;Kocyigit, Yucel;Kuran, Sibel Bulgurcuoglu;Bulut, Huri;Gungor, Mete;Buyru, Faruk;Bastu, Ercan;
Vol. 36 , No. 6 , pp. 1127-1133
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pregnancy outcomes of reciprocal translocation carriers with two or more unfavorable pregnancy histories: before and after preimplantation genetic testing.
Huang, Caiyi;Jiang, Wenjie;Zhu, Yueting;Li, Hongchang;Lu, Juanjuan;Yan, Junhao;Chen, Zi-Jiang;
336 views DOI Abstract
2016
Semen as virus reservoir?
Cardona Maya, Walter D;Du Plessis, Stefan S;Velilla, Paula A;
Vol. 33 , No. 9 , pp. 1255-6
320 views DOI
2019
Transfer of embryos with positive results following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M): experience of two high-volume fertility clinics
Besser, A.
, pp. 0-0
306 views DOI
View All 66 Articles
33
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.