biodiversitas | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3170 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

biodiversitas

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name biodiversitas
Abbreviated Name biodiversitas
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://smujo.id/nb
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2019
Ethnobotany of traditional medicinal plants used by dayak desa community in sintang, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
Supiandi, M.
Vol. 20 , pp. 1264-1270
432 views DOI
2008
Biomonitoring of ecosystem degradation caused by CPO waste of Mentaya River in Central Kalimantan use of esterase isozyme electromorph method
SETYONO, PRABANG;SOETARTO, ENDANG SUTARININGSIH;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 232-236
365 views Abstract
2006
patterns of martyrial sanctity in the royal ideology of medieval serbia continuity and change
;Marjanović-Dušanić Smilja
Vol. 2006 , No. 37 , pp. 69-79
340 views DOI Abstract
2003
serbian-albanian language contacts and two types of phonological systems in the balkan languages
;Stanišić Vanja S.
Vol. 2003 , No. 34 , pp. 105-117
318 views DOI Abstract
2007
Viability tests of LIPI-MC mould collection in ampoule of L-drying preservation after one year of storage at 5ºC
ILYAS, MUHAMMAD;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 20-22
310 views Abstract
2020
Impact of mycoinsecticides and abamectin applications on species diversity and abundance of aquatic insects in rice fields of freshwater swamps of south sumatra, Indonesia
Herlinda, S.
Vol. 21 , pp. 3076-3083
279 views DOI
2006
The effect of some organic compounds and NAA application on the in vitro growth of the black orchid (Coelogyne pandurata Lindl.)
UNTARI, RINI;PUSPITANINGTYAS, DWI MURTI;
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 344-348
250 views Abstract
2006
people in my life: picture of socialization
;Likomanova Iskra
Vol. 2006 , No. 37 , pp. 61-68
245 views DOI Abstract
2002
tragom ranih keltskih uticaja na prostoru timočke krajine
;Sladić Miodrag B.
Vol. 2002 , No. 32-33 , pp. 37-47
241 views DOI Abstract
2015
Effects of timber harvest on structural diversity and species composition in hardwood forests
TAVANKAR, FARZAM;BONYAD, AMIR ESLAM;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
230 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.