journal of traditional and complementary medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1209 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

journal of traditional and complementary medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name j tradit complement med
Abbreviated Name j tradit complement med
ISSN 2225-4110
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-traditional-and-complementary-medicine
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2014
Recent Scientific Studies of a Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tea, on Prevention of Chronic Diseases
Yang, Chung S.;Chen, Gang;Wu, Qing;
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 17-23
366 views Abstract
2019
Tualang honey ameliorates viral load, CD4 counts and improves quality of life in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infected patients
Wan, Yusuf W.
Vol. 9 , pp. 249-256
355 views DOI
2020
Naringenin mitigates antituberculosis drugs induced hepatic and renal injury in rats.
Sahu, Nisha;Mishra, Gita;Chandra, Hemeshwer Kumar;Nirala, Satendra Kumar;Bhadauria, Monika;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 26-35
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Anti-ulcer effect of Gallarhois extract with anti-oxidant activity in an ICR model of ethanol/hydrochloride acid-induced gastric injury.
Song, Sung Hwa;Kim, Ji Eun;Sung, Ji Eun;Lee, Hyun Ah;Yun, Woo Bin;Lee, Young Hee;Song, HyunKeun;Hwang, DaeYoun;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 372-382
299 views DOI Abstract
2016
contributions regarding impact on the natural environment of a nuclear equipment buliding company
;Gheorghe AMZA;Dan Florin NIXOI;Andrei DIMITRESCU;Zoia APOSTOLESCU;Gabriel Dan TAŞCa;Marius Cornel TEODORESCU
Vol. 1-Suppl , No. 1 , pp. 28-35
298 views Abstract
2015
Re-discovering ancient wheat varieties as functional foods
Cooper, Raymond;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 138-143
296 views DOI
2016
Quality standards for Hutabhugādi cūrṇa (Ayurvedic Formulary of India).
Pushpendra, ;Sunil Kumar, Koppala Narayana;Priyadarshini, ;Holla, Bantwal Shivarama;Ravishankar, Basaviah;Yashovarma, Betkeri;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 78-88
287 views DOI Abstract
2012
flexible service binding in distributed automation and control system
;Cristiana VOICAN;Constantin STANESCU
Vol. 1 supliment , No. 10 , pp. 428-434
281 views Abstract
2019
plants - Review on phytopharmacy properties.
Salehi, Bahare;Ezzat, Shahira M;Tsouh Fokou, Patrick Valere;Albayrak, Sevil;Vlaisavljevic, Sanja;Sharifi-Rad, Majid;Bhatt, Indra D;Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi;Belwal, Tarun;Ayatollahi, Seyed Abdulmajid;Kobarfard, Farzad;Ata, Athar;Baghalpour, Navid;Martorell, Miquel;Setzer, William N;Sharifi-Rad, Javad;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 201-205
271 views DOI Abstract
2019
Profiling and determination of phenolic compounds in poly herbal formulations and their comparative evaluation.
Dinakaran, Sathis Kumar;Chelle, Shalaka;Avasarala, Harani;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 319-327
270 views DOI Abstract
View All 39 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.