medicinal chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3866 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

medicinal chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name medicinal chemistry
Abbreviated Name medicinal chemistry
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2019
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 1H-1,2,3-triazole-linked- 1H-dibenzo[b,h]xanthenes as inductors of ROS-mediated apoptosis in the breast cancer cell line MCF-7
Bortolot, C.
Vol. 15 , pp. 119-129
500 views DOI
2019
Antiproliferative activity and characterization of metabolites of aspergillus nidulans: An endophytic fungus from nyctanthes arbor-tristis linn. Against three human cancer cell lines
Sana, T.
Vol. 15 , pp. 352-359
384 views DOI
2015
intervención con un programa de ejercicio físico en la empresa
;M.ª Lourdes Pérez Marín;Fernando Yélamos Rodríguez;Manuel Antonio Rodríguez Pérez
Vol. 61 , No. 240 , pp. 342-353
317 views Abstract
2007
implicación de las personas en la evaluación de riesgos laborales
;Maite Domínguez Fernández;Elena Gabilondo Larrañaga;Elena Fernández Goméz;Jesús Muñoz Fernández;Fernando Rico Alonso
Vol. 53 , No. 206 , pp. 15-20
298 views Abstract
2007
impartición de una asignatura de salud laboral en una escuela universitaria de enfermería
;Alfonso Meneses Monroy
Vol. 53 , No. 208 , pp. 21-26
293 views Abstract
2011
drogodependencias en el lugar de trabajo: pautas generales de intervención desde la medicina del trabajo illicit drugs in the workplace: general guidelines of intervention from the occupational health
;Carmen Otero Dorrego
Vol. 57 , pp. 145-172
281 views Abstract
2014
dermatitis aerotrasportada de origen laboral en la industria química, farmacéutica y sector sanitario
;E. Jaureguizar Cervera;M. Pérez Perdomo;L. Reinoso Barbero
Vol. 60 , No. 237 , pp. 742-755
240 views Abstract
2010
influencia de la insatisfacción laboral en las demandas de cambio de puesto de trabajo por motivos de salud influence of the job dissatisfaction in the demands of the job change for reasons of health
;Fernando Mansilla Izquierdo;Juan Carlos García Micó;Casimiro Gamero Merino;Aurora Congosto Gonzalo
Vol. 56 , No. 219 , pp. 147-157
239 views Abstract
2009
medicina del trabajo y calidad del diagnóstico de los procesos causantes de incapacidad temporal occupational health and quality of diagnosis in the sickness absence processes
;Esther Álvarez Theurer;Manuel Vaquero Abellán
Vol. 55 , No. 214 , pp. 72-79
210 views Abstract
2018
Synthesis, characterization and biological activities of new symmetric bis-1,2,3-triazoles with click chemistry
Çelik, F.
Vol. 14 , pp. 230-241
207 views DOI
View All 28 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.