fungal biology and biotechnology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5979 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

fungal biology and biotechnology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name fungal biol biotechnol
Abbreviated Name fungal biol biotechnol
ISSN 2054-3085
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/40694
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (48 total)

2014
variations in superior thyroid artery: a selective angiographic study
;Pankaj Gupta;Ashu Seith Bhalla;Sanjay Thulkar;Atin Kumar;Bidhu Kalyan Mohanti;Alok Thakar;Atul Sharma
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 66-71
370 views DOI Abstract
2015
tumefactive intramural gossypiboma of the urinary bladder mimicking an invasive adnexal malignancy
;Shivi Jain;Ashish Verma;Madhu Jain;Sameer Trivedi;Ram C Shukla;Arvind Srivastava
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 193-195
324 views DOI Abstract
2010
color doppler evaluation of cerebral-umbilical pulsatility ratio and its usefulness in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome
;Bano Shahina;Chaudhary Vikas;Pande Sanjay;Mehta V;Sharma A
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 20-25
310 views Abstract
2019
The fungal gene cluster for biosynthesis of the antibacterial agent viriditoxin.
Urquhart, Andrew S;Hu, Jinyu;Chooi, Yit-Heng;Idnurm, Alexander;
Vol. 6 , pp. 2
301 views DOI Abstract
2011
superficial temporal artery calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease: association with vascular risk factors and ischemic cerebrovascular disease
;Zeeshan Anwar;Elcin Zan;Marco Carone;Arzu Ozturk;Stephen M Sozio;David M Yousem
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 215-220
292 views DOI Abstract
2015
endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction as a complication of prolonged hemodialysis – preliminary experience in a tertiary care center
;Mukesh K Yadav;Madhurima Sharma;Anupam Lal;Vivek Gupta;Ashish Sharma;Niranjan Khandelwal
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 368-374
271 views DOI Abstract
2016
young patient with generalized lymphangiomatosis: differentiating the differential
;Tharani Putta;Aparna Irodi;Balamugesh Thangakunam;Ashwin Oliver;Rajesh Gunasingam
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 411-415
263 views DOI Abstract
2009
how to improve your breast cancer program: standardized reporting using the new american college of radiology breast imaging-reporting and data system
;Ojeda-Fournier Haydee;Nguyen Judy
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 266-277
256 views Abstract
2017
multimodality imaging spectrum of complications of horseshoe kidney
;Hardik U Shah;Vijayanadh Ojili
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 133-140
247 views DOI Abstract
2016
significance of color doppler imaging in leprosy
;Yashant Aswani
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 418-419
244 views DOI
View All 48 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.