Indexed in Journament

journal of radiation research

ISSN 1349-9157· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,081 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 17.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j radiat res
Abbreviated Name j radiat res
ISSN 1349-9157

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 80.0
Diversity 11.1
Innovation 19.5
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 19.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of radiation research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 80.0 5.8
Diversity 11.1 24.4
Innovation 19.5 25.7
Community Impact 7.1 5.8
Content Distribution 19.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2019
Protective effects of zingerone derivate on ionizing radiation-induced intestinal injury.
Vol. 60 , No. 6 , pp. 740-746
1,063 views DOI Abstract
2019
Immunotropic effects in cultured human blood mononuclear cells exposed to a 900 MHz pulse-modulated microwave field.
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Physical dosimetry reconstructions of significant radiation exposure at an industrial accelerator facility in Tianjin (China).
304 views DOI Abstract
2018
Meta-analysis of thirty-two case-control and two ecological radon studies of lung cancer.
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 149-163
259 views DOI Abstract
2026
Safety of carbon-ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer after rectal surgery: a single-institution retrospective study
52 views DOI Abstract
2026
Patient stratification for dose scaling in cervical cancer: a model-based analysis using image-guided adaptive brachytherapy
52 views DOI Abstract
2026
The feasibility and toxicity of the second course of boron neutron capture therapy in recurrent head and neck cancer patients
41 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of combination metformin and nintedanib therapy in a mouse model of irradiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis
20 views DOI Abstract
2026
Image-guided moderately hypofractionated proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of a phase II trial
40 views DOI Abstract
2026
Prospective feasibility study of diagnostic CT-based simulation-free palliative radiotherapy
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Dosimetric evaluation of patient-side range shifters using two materials for superficial region treatment in spot scanning proton therapy: impact of material, air gap and setup distance
34 views DOI Abstract
2026
The feasibility and toxicity of the second course of boron neutron capture therapy in recurrent head and neck cancer patients
41 views DOI Abstract
2026
Relationship between rectal bleeding and radiation delivery time in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a preliminary study
26 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,081 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

19.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

19.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.