italian journal of animal science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1002 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

italian journal of animal science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim
Short Name italian journal of animal science
Abbreviated Name italian journal of animal science
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (130 total)

2014
seroprevalence of rubella igg antibody in pregnant women in osogbo, nigeria
;Olatunji Mathew Kolawole;Ekuntoye O Anjorin;Daniel A Adekanle;Caroline Folashade Kolawole;Kabir Adekunle Durowade
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 287-292
679 views Abstract
2013
analysis of relationship between tumor necrosis factor alpha gene (g308a polymorphism) with preterm labor
;Lobat Jafarzadeh;Azar Danesh;Marzieh Sadeghi;Fateme Heybati;Morteza Hashemzadeh
Vol. 4 , No. 8 , pp. 896-901
518 views Abstract
2012
immunization against haemophilus influenzae type b in iran; cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses
;Maziar Moradi-Lakeh;Sareh Shakerian;Abdoulreza Esteghamati
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 332-340
513 views Abstract
2012
effects of cinnamon consumption on glycemic status, lipid profile and body composition in type 2 diabetic patients
;Mohammadreza Vafa;Farhad Mohammadi;Farzad Shidfar;Mohammadhossein Salehi Sormaghi;Iraj Heidari;Banafshe Golestan;Fatemehsadat Amiri
Vol. 3 , No. 8 , pp. 531-536
493 views Abstract
2010
Companion animal welfare and possible implications on the human-pet relationship
Verga, Marina;Michelazzi, Manuela;
Vol. 8 , No. 1s , pp. 231-240
482 views Abstract
2017
the effects of aerobic exercises and 25(oh) d supplementation on glp1 and dpp4 level in type ii diabetic patients
;Naser Rahimi;Mohammad Ali Samavati Sharif;Amir Reza Goharian;Ali Heidarian Pour
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 56-56
460 views DOI Abstract
2013
barriers of clinical practice guidelines development and implementation in developing countries: a case study in iran
;Zahra Baradaran Seyed;Sima Nedjat;Bahareh Yazdizadeh;Saharnaz Nedjat;Reza Majdzadeh
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 340-348
454 views Abstract
2010
Grains colonised by moulds: fungal identification and headspace analysis of produced volatile metabolites
Tampieri, Maria Paola;Bonoli, Cristina;Canestrari, Giorgia;Simioli, Marco;Galuppi, Roberta;Rizzi, Laura;
Vol. 8 , No. 2s , pp. 334-336
442 views Abstract
2014
iranian audience poll on smoking scenes in persian movies in 2011
;Gholamreza Heydari
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 164-170
422 views Abstract
2014
roles of the nucleus accumbens (shell) in the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced conditioned behavior in freely moving rats
;Sara Karimi;Maryam Radahmadi;Mohammad Fazilati;Hamid Azizi-Malekabadi;Hojjatallah Alaei
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 262-268
401 views Abstract
View All 130 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.