Indexed in Journament

european journal of pain (london, england)

ISSN 1532-2149· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,484 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
5 Articles
Scores higher than 94.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur j pain
Abbreviated Name eur j pain
ISSN 1532-2149

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 72.2
Innovation 33.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 95.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 72.2 24.4
Innovation 33.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.7 5.8
Content Distribution 95.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (5)

2019
Metacognition, perseverative thinking, and pain catastrophizing: a moderated-mediation analysis.
Schütze, Robert;Rees, Clare;Smith, Anne;Slater, Helen;O'Sullivan, Peter;
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Laughing away the pain: A narrative review of humour, sense of humour and pain.
Pérez-Aranda, Adrián;Hofmann, Jennifer;Feliu-Soler, Albert;Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen;Andrés-Rodríguez, Laura;Ruch, Willibald;Luciano, Juan V;
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 220-233
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
The COX-2 inhibitor etoricoxib reduces experimental osteoarthritis and nociception in rats: The roles of TGF-β1 and NGF expressions in chondrocytes.
Wen, Zhi-Hong;Lin, Yen-You;Chang, Yi-Chen;Tang, Chi-Chieh;Hsieh, Shih-Peng;Lee, Hsin-Pai;Sung, Chun-Sung;Chen, Wu-Fu;Lee, Chian-Her;Jean, Yen-Hsuan;
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Spinal manipulation for the management of cervicogenic headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fernandez, Matthew;Moore, Craig;Tan, Jinghan;Lian, Derrick;Nguyen, Jeremy;Bacon, Andrew;Christie, Brie;Shen, Isabella;Waldie, Thomas;Simonet, Danielle;Bussières, André;
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Observational pain assessment in older persons with dementia in four countries: observer agreement of items and factor structure of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition.
de Waal, Margot W M;van Dalen-Kok, Annelore H;de Vet, Henrica C W;Gimenez-Llort, Lydia;Konstantinovic, Ljubica;de Tommaso, Marina;Fischer, Thomas;Lukas, Albert;Kunz, Miriam;Lautenbacher, Stefan;Lobbezoo, Frank;McGuire, Brian E;van der Steen, Jenny T;Achterberg, Wilco P;, ;
367 views DOI Abstract
2020
Spinal manipulation for the management of cervicogenic headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fernandez, Matthew;Moore, Craig;Tan, Jinghan;Lian, Derrick;Nguyen, Jeremy;Bacon, Andrew;Christie, Brie;Shen, Isabella;Waldie, Thomas;Simonet, Danielle;Bussières, André;
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Metacognition, perseverative thinking, and pain catastrophizing: a moderated-mediation analysis.
Schütze, Robert;Rees, Clare;Smith, Anne;Slater, Helen;O'Sullivan, Peter;
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Laughing away the pain: A narrative review of humour, sense of humour and pain.
Pérez-Aranda, Adrián;Hofmann, Jennifer;Feliu-Soler, Albert;Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen;Andrés-Rodríguez, Laura;Ruch, Willibald;Luciano, Juan V;
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 220-233
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
Observational pain assessment in older persons with dementia in four countries: observer agreement of items and factor structure of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition.
de Waal, Margot W M;van Dalen-Kok, Annelore H;de Vet, Henrica C W;Gimenez-Llort, Lydia;Konstantinovic, Ljubica;de Tommaso, Marina;Fischer, Thomas;Lukas, Albert;Kunz, Miriam;Lautenbacher, Stefan;Lobbezoo, Frank;McGuire, Brian E;van der Steen, Jenny T;Achterberg, Wilco P;, ;
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
The COX-2 inhibitor etoricoxib reduces experimental osteoarthritis and nociception in rats: The roles of TGF-β1 and NGF expressions in chondrocytes.
Wen, Zhi-Hong;Lin, Yen-You;Chang, Yi-Chen;Tang, Chi-Chieh;Hsieh, Shih-Peng;Lee, Hsin-Pai;Sung, Chun-Sung;Chen, Wu-Fu;Lee, Chian-Her;Jean, Yen-Hsuan;
381 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,484 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

33.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

95.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.