Indexed in Journament

Human reproduction open

ISSN 2399-3529· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.4/100
Journament Score
#13,957
Journament Rank
41
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Hum Reprod Open
Abbreviated Name hum reprod open
ISSN 2399-3529

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2019
Protestant Christian attitudes to ART.
Vol. 2019 , No. 3 , pp. hoz018
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evidence summaries and recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: assessment and treatment of infertility.
Vol. 2019 , No. 1 , pp. hoy021
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reduced oxygen concentration during human IVF culture improves embryo utilization and cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle.
Vol. 2020 , No. 1 , pp. hoz036
369 views DOI Abstract
2020
Endometrial thickness as a biomarker for ongoing pregnancy in IUI for unexplained subfertility: a secondary analysis.
Vol. 2020 , No. 1 , pp. hoz024
343 views DOI Abstract
2018
No effect of IVF culture medium on cognitive development of 9-year-old children.
Vol. 2018 , No. 4 , pp. hoy018
339 views DOI Abstract
2024
A 20-year overview of fertility preservation in boys: new insights gained through a comprehensive international survey.
Vol. 2024 , No. 2 , pp. hoae010
147 views DOI Abstract
2022
ESHRE guideline: endometriosis
51 views DOI Abstract
2018
ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss
47 views DOI Abstract
2026
The impact of vasectomy on the seminal microbiome: possible implications and source of microbes
26 views DOI Abstract
2026
Reply: Reconsidering the interpretation of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in ART decision-making
25 views DOI
2026
Effect of cryopreservation duration on pregnancy outcomes in embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Geographic patterns of ovarian tissue cryopreservation utilisation across age groups in a nationwide multicentre cohort
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Long-term systemic outcomes of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy by age at menopause: a real-world cohort study
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Once-daily, late-night, modified-release hydrocortisone rapidly normalizes menstrual cyclicity in women with non-classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Transitioning AI-based sperm assessment from proof-of-concept to clinical practice
3 views DOI
2026
Association between body roundness index and pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Risk factors associated with meiotic errors in blastocysts with mosaic results on biopsy
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
From a single child to family planning: determinants of returning to ART to build the desired family in a monocentric Italian cohort
11 views DOI Abstract
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
90
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.