environmental earth sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#725 / 33,930
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

environmental earth sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name environmental earth sciences
Abbreviated Name environmental earth sciences
ISSN 1866-6280
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.springer.com/journal/12665
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2009
Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and uptake by plant species with phytoremediation potential
Nouri, J;Khorasani, N;Lorestani, B;Karami, M;Hassani, AH;Yousefi, N
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 315-323
373 views
2018
LiDAR-supported prediction of slope failures using an integrated ensemble weights-of-evidence and analytical hierarchy process
Abolfazl Jaafari;Abolfazl Jaafari;
Vol. 77 , No. 2 , pp. 1-15
330 views DOI Abstract
2009
Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models
Biswajeet Pradhan;Saro Lee;Biswajeet Pradhan;Saro Lee;
Vol. 60 , No. 5 , pp. 1037-1054
315 views DOI Abstract
2016
Random forests and evidential belief function-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Mazandaran Province, Iran
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Norman Kerle;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Norman Kerle;
Vol. 75 , No. 3 , pp. 1-17
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Locating groundwater artificial recharge sites using random forest: a case study of Shabestar region, Iran
Norouzi, H.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
295 views DOI
2019
An evaluation of potential toxic metals in sediments of a tropical watershed in southern Benue Trough, Nigeria
Ayogu, C.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
293 views DOI
2019
Application of a loose coupling model for assessing the impact of land-cover changes on groundwater recharge in the Jinan spring area, China
Wen, C.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
280 views DOI
2012
Phosphate amendment of metalliferous tailings, Cannington Ag–Pb–Zn mine, Australia: implications for the capping of tailings storage facilities
N. C. Munksgaard;B. G. Lottermoser;N. C. Munksgaard;B. G. Lottermoser;
Vol. 68 , No. 1 , pp. 33-44
272 views DOI Abstract
2018
Application of analytic hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and statistical index to landslide susceptibility: an approach to endangered cultural heritage
Ionut Cristi Nicu;Ionut Cristi Nicu;
Vol. 77 , No. 3 , pp. 1-16
265 views DOI Abstract
2017
Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid intelligence approach
Ataollah Shirzadi;Dieu Tien Bui;Binh Thai Pham;Karim Solaimani;Kamran Chapi;Ataollah Kavian;Himan Shahabi;Inge Revhaug;Ataollah Shirzadi;Dieu Tien Bui;Binh Thai Pham;Karim Solaimani;Kamran Chapi;Ataollah Kavian;Himan Shahabi;Inge Revhaug;
Vol. 76 , No. 2 , pp. 1-18
256 views DOI Abstract
View All 29 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.