Indexed in Journament

environmental earth sciences

ISSN 1866-6280· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,609 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
29 Articles
Scores higher than 46.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name environmental earth sciences
Abbreviated Name environmental earth sciences
ISSN 1866-6280
URL http://www.springer.com/journal/12665

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 37.0 22.2
Innovation 33.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 4.1
Content Distribution 77.9 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

2009
Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and uptake by plant species with phytoremediation potential
Nouri, J;Khorasani, N;Lorestani, B;Karami, M;Hassani, AH;Yousefi, N
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 315-323
414 views
2018
LiDAR-supported prediction of slope failures using an integrated ensemble weights-of-evidence and analytical hierarchy process
Abolfazl Jaafari;Abolfazl Jaafari;
Vol. 77 , No. 2 , pp. 1-15
398 views DOI Abstract
2009
Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models
Biswajeet Pradhan;Saro Lee;Biswajeet Pradhan;Saro Lee;
Vol. 60 , No. 5 , pp. 1037-1054
386 views DOI Abstract
2016
Random forests and evidential belief function-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Mazandaran Province, Iran
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Norman Kerle;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Norman Kerle;
Vol. 75 , No. 3 , pp. 1-17
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Locating groundwater artificial recharge sites using random forest: a case study of Shabestar region, Iran
Norouzi, H.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2011
Seismic stability analysis of soil nail reinforced slope using kinematic approach of limit analysis
Siming He;Chaojun Ouyang;Yu Luo;Siming He;Chaojun Ouyang;Yu Luo;
Vol. 66 , No. 1 , pp. 319-326
340 views DOI Abstract
2018
Application of analytic hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and statistical index to landslide susceptibility: an approach to endangered cultural heritage
Ionut Cristi Nicu;Ionut Cristi Nicu;
Vol. 77 , No. 3 , pp. 1-16
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Application of a loose coupling model for assessing the impact of land-cover changes on groundwater recharge in the Jinan spring area, China
Wen, C.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
338 views DOI
2019
An evaluation of potential toxic metals in sediments of a tropical watershed in southern Benue Trough, Nigeria
Ayogu, C.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
331 views DOI
2012
Phosphate amendment of metalliferous tailings, Cannington Ag–Pb–Zn mine, Australia: implications for the capping of tailings storage facilities
N. C. Munksgaard;B. G. Lottermoser;N. C. Munksgaard;B. G. Lottermoser;
Vol. 68 , No. 1 , pp. 33-44
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
Discrimination of water-inrush source and evolution analysis of hydrochemical environment under mining in Renlou coal mine, Anhui Province, China
Zhang, J.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
123 views DOI
2019
Correction to: Relationship between sand dew and plant leaf dew and its significance in irrigation water supplementation in Guanzhong Basin, China (Environmental Earth Sciences, (2019), 78, 12, (354), 10.1007/s12665-019-8345-6)
Jia, Z.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
228 views DOI
2019
Was the trend of the net sediment flux in Poyang Lake, China, altered by the Three Gorges Dam or by sand mining?
Wang, P.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
266 views DOI
2019
Effect of instream sand mining on hydraulic variables of bedload transport and channel planform: an alluvial stream in South Bengal basin, India
Bhattacharya, R.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
224 views DOI
2019
Cloud computing-based high accuracy surface modeling method for China’s Poyang Lake basin DEM generation
Yan, C.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
247 views DOI
2019
An evaluation of potential toxic metals in sediments of a tropical watershed in southern Benue Trough, Nigeria
Ayogu, C.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
331 views DOI
2019
Locating groundwater artificial recharge sites using random forest: a case study of Shabestar region, Iran
Norouzi, H.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2019
Application of a loose coupling model for assessing the impact of land-cover changes on groundwater recharge in the Jinan spring area, China
Wen, C.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
338 views DOI
2018
LiDAR-supported prediction of slope failures using an integrated ensemble weights-of-evidence and analytical hierarchy process
Abolfazl Jaafari;Abolfazl Jaafari;
Vol. 77 , No. 2 , pp. 1-15
398 views DOI Abstract
2018
Application of analytic hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and statistical index to landslide susceptibility: an approach to endangered cultural heritage
Ionut Cristi Nicu;Ionut Cristi Nicu;
Vol. 77 , No. 3 , pp. 1-16
339 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,609 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

33.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.