journal of hydrology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1213 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

journal of hydrology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name j hydrol (amst)
Abbreviated Name journal of hydrology
ISSN 0022-1694
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/503343/description
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2017
Multi-scale quantitative precipitation forecasting using nonlinear and nonstationary teleconnection signals and artificial neural network models.
Chang, Ni-Bin;Yang, Y Jeffrey;Imen, Sanaz;Mullon, Lee;
Vol. 548 , pp. 305-321
379 views Abstract
2019
Simulating lake and wetland areal coverage under future groundwater recharge projections: The Nebraska Sand Hills system
Rossman, N.
Vol. 576 , pp. 185-196
360 views DOI
2020
The cloud model based stochastic multi-criteria decision making technology for river health assessment under multiple uncertainties
Yang, Z.
Vol. 581 , pp. 0-0
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Response of soil water movement and groundwater recharge to extreme precipitation in a headwater catchment in the North China Plain
Zheng, W.
Vol. 576 , pp. 466-477
336 views DOI
2016
Application of least square support vector machine and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in long term prediction of river water pollution
Kisi, O.
Vol. 534 , pp. 104-112
325 views DOI
2019
Seasonal and diurnal variations in DIC, NO<inf>3</inf><sup>−</sup> and TOC concentrations in spring-pond ecosystems under different land-uses at the Shawan Karst Test Site, SW China: Carbon limitation of aquatic photosynthesis
Zeng, S.
Vol. 574 , pp. 811-821
310 views DOI
2019
Contribution of rainfall and agricultural returns to groundwater recharge in arid areas
Jafari, H.
Vol. 575 , pp. 1230-1238
304 views DOI
2019
Groundwater dynamics due to general stream fluctuations in an unconfined single or dual-porosity aquifer subjected to general areal recharge
Sedghi, M.
Vol. 574 , pp. 436-449
286 views DOI
2015
Spatio-temporal estimation of consumptive water use for assessment of irrigation system performance and management of water resources in irrigated Indus Basin, Pakistan
Usman, M.
Vol. 525 , pp. 26-41
286 views DOI
2006
Response to comment by Jozsef Szilagyi on "Using numerical modelling to evaluate the capillary fringe groundwater ridging hypothesis of streamflow generation" (Journal of Hydrology 316 (2006) 141-162)
Cloke, H.
Vol. 329 , pp. 730-732
273 views DOI
View All 26 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.