Indexed in Journament

forest ecology and management

ISSN 0378-1127· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.8/100
Journament Score
#8,594
Journament Rank
35
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name forest ecology and management
Abbreviated Name forest ecology and management
ISSN 0378-1127
URL http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco

Indexings

scopus ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2018
Improving the sustainability of working landscapes in Latin America: An application of community-based monitoring data on bird populations to inform management guidelines
Ortega-Álvarez, R.
Vol. 409 , pp. 56-66
353 views DOI
2014
analyzing mediators of the customer satisfaction - loyalty relation in internet retailing
;Simona VINEREAN;Alin OPREANA
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
346 views Abstract
2019
Sprinkling infiltration as an artificial groundwater recharge method – Long-term effects on boreal forest soil, tree growth and understory vegetation
Kaarakka, L.
Vol. 448 , pp. 240-248
344 views DOI
2019
Burn probability simulation and subsequent wildland fire activity in Alberta, Canada – Implications for risk assessment and strategic planning
Beverly, J.
Vol. 451 , pp. 0-0
313 views DOI
2020
Long-term variation in white-tailed deer abundance shapes landscape-scale population dynamics of forest-breeding birds
Rushing, C.
Vol. 456 , pp. 0-0
303 views DOI
2020
Species dominance rather than species asynchrony determines the temporal stability of productivity in four subtropical forests along 30 years of restoration
Yu, Q.
Vol. 457 , pp. 0-0
297 views DOI
2020
How does forest management affect fungal diversity and community composition? Current knowledge and future perspectives for the conservation of forest fungi
Tomao, A.
Vol. 457 , pp. 0-0
264 views DOI
2017
a multi-method approach to understanding behavior change. the case of texting and driving
;Karen M. HOOD;Christine M. KOWALCZYK;Christopher D. HOPKINS;Daniel PADGETT
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 78-91
258 views Abstract
2020
Assessing multi-scale habitat relationships and responses to forest management for cryptic and uncommon herpetofauna in the Missouri Ozarks, USA
Timm, S.
Vol. 460 , pp. 0-0
256 views DOI
2020
Call for a collaborative management at Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Malaysia: An assessment from local stakeholders’ view point
Martínez-Espinosa, C.
Vol. 458 , pp. 0-0
255 views DOI
2020
Call for a collaborative management at Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Malaysia: An assessment from local stakeholders’ view point
Martínez-Espinosa, C.
Vol. 458 , pp. 0-0
255 views DOI
2020
Forest management has reduced the structural diversity of residual boreal old-growth forest landscapes in Eastern Canada
Martin, M.
Vol. 458 , pp. 0-0
160 views DOI
2020
The effects of selective timber harvesting in buffer strips along headwater channels using best management practices on runoff, turbidity and suspended sediment yield in an intensively cut eucalypt forest in southeastern Australia
Walsh, P.
Vol. 458 , pp. 0-0
216 views DOI
2020
Positive outcomes between herbivore diversity and tree survival: Responses to management intensity in a Patagonian forest
Nacif, M.
Vol. 458 , pp. 0-0
175 views DOI
2020
Corrigendum to “Importance of stand structure and neighborhood in European beech regeneration” (Forest Ecology and Management (2019) 448 (57–66), (S0378112719304281), (10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.066))
Žemaitis, P.
Vol. 459 , pp. 0-0
190 views DOI
2020
Stand attributes or soil micro-environment exert greater influence than management type on understory plant diversity in even-aged oak high forests
Wei, L.
Vol. 460 , pp. 0-0
164 views DOI
2020
Assessing multi-scale habitat relationships and responses to forest management for cryptic and uncommon herpetofauna in the Missouri Ozarks, USA
Timm, S.
Vol. 460 , pp. 0-0
256 views DOI
2020
Initial establishment of commercial tree species under enrichment planting in a Central Amazon secondary forest: Effects of silvicultural treatments
dos, Santos V.
Vol. 460 , pp. 0-0
187 views DOI
2020
Are photosynthetic leaf traits related to the first-year growth of tropical tree seedlings? A light-induced plasticity test in a secondary forest enrichment planting
dos, Santos V.
Vol. 460 , pp. 0-0
129 views DOI
2020
How does forest management affect fungal diversity and community composition? Current knowledge and future perspectives for the conservation of forest fungi
Tomao, A.
Vol. 457 , pp. 0-0
264 views DOI
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.