Indexed in Journament

acta orthopaedica

ISSN 1745-3674· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,164 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
6 Articles
Scores higher than 17.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name acta orthop
Abbreviated Name acta orthopaedica
ISSN 1745-3674

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 40.5
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 79.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 40.5 25.7
Community Impact 7.1 5.8
Content Distribution 79.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (6)

2018
Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016
Spekenbrink-Spooren, Anneke;Steenbergen, Liza N Van;Denissen, Geke A W;Swierstra, Bart A;Poolman, Rudolf W;Nelissen, Rob G H H;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 640-645
663 views Abstract
2017
Posterior approach compared to direct lateral approach resulted in better patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: 20,908 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register
Kristensen, Torbjørn B;Vinje, Tarjei;Havelin, Leif I;Engesæter, Lars B;Gjertsen, Jan-Erik;
Vol. 88 , No. 1 , pp. 29-34
521 views Abstract
2018
Time of admission and mortality after hip fracture: a detailed look at the weekend effect in a nationwide study of 55,211 hip fracture patients in Norway
Andreas Asheim,Sara Marie Nilsen,Marlen Toch-Marquardt,Kjartan Sarheim Anthun,Lars Gunnar Johnsen,Johan H Bjørngaard;Andreas Asheim;Sara Marie Nilsen;Marlen Toch-Marquardt;Kjartan Sarheim Anthun;Lars Gunnar Johnsen;Johan H Bjørngaard;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 610-614
494 views DOI Abstract
2017
Peripheral snap-fit locking mechanisms and smooth surface finish of tibial trays reduce backside wear in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A retrieval analysis of 102 inlays
Łapaj, Łukasz;Mróz, Adrian;Kokoszka, Paweł;Markuszewski, Jacek;Wendland, Justyna;Helak-Łapaj, Celina;Kruczyński, Jacek;
Vol. 88 , No. 1 , pp. 62-69
442 views Abstract
2016
Routine functional assessment for hip fracture patients: Are there sufficient predictive properties for subgroup identification in treatment and rehabilitation?
Pedersen, T.
Vol. 87 , pp. 374-379
314 views DOI
2018
Trauma simulation training: a randomized controlled trial -evaluating the effectiveness of the Imperial Femoral Intramedullary Nailing Cognitive Task Analysis (IFINCTA) tool.
Bhattacharyya, Rahul;Sugand, Kapil;Al-Obaidi, Bilal;Sinha, Ian;Bhattacharya, Rajarshi;Gupte, Chinmay M;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 689-695
277 views DOI Abstract
2018
Time of admission and mortality after hip fracture: a detailed look at the weekend effect in a nationwide study of 55,211 hip fracture patients in Norway
Andreas Asheim,Sara Marie Nilsen,Marlen Toch-Marquardt,Kjartan Sarheim Anthun,Lars Gunnar Johnsen,Johan H Bjørngaard;Andreas Asheim;Sara Marie Nilsen;Marlen Toch-Marquardt;Kjartan Sarheim Anthun;Lars Gunnar Johnsen;Johan H Bjørngaard;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 610-614
494 views DOI Abstract
2018
Trauma simulation training: a randomized controlled trial -evaluating the effectiveness of the Imperial Femoral Intramedullary Nailing Cognitive Task Analysis (IFINCTA) tool.
Bhattacharyya, Rahul;Sugand, Kapil;Al-Obaidi, Bilal;Sinha, Ian;Bhattacharya, Rajarshi;Gupte, Chinmay M;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 689-695
277 views DOI Abstract
2018
Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016
Spekenbrink-Spooren, Anneke;Steenbergen, Liza N Van;Denissen, Geke A W;Swierstra, Bart A;Poolman, Rudolf W;Nelissen, Rob G H H;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 640-645
663 views Abstract
2017
Posterior approach compared to direct lateral approach resulted in better patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: 20,908 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register
Kristensen, Torbjørn B;Vinje, Tarjei;Havelin, Leif I;Engesæter, Lars B;Gjertsen, Jan-Erik;
Vol. 88 , No. 1 , pp. 29-34
521 views Abstract
2017
Peripheral snap-fit locking mechanisms and smooth surface finish of tibial trays reduce backside wear in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A retrieval analysis of 102 inlays
Łapaj, Łukasz;Mróz, Adrian;Kokoszka, Paweł;Markuszewski, Jacek;Wendland, Justyna;Helak-Łapaj, Celina;Kruczyński, Jacek;
Vol. 88 , No. 1 , pp. 62-69
442 views Abstract
2016
Routine functional assessment for hip fracture patients: Are there sufficient predictive properties for subgroup identification in treatment and rehabilitation?
Pedersen, T.
Vol. 87 , pp. 374-379
314 views DOI
Journament Score
28.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,164 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.