Indexed in Journament

acta orthopaedica

ISSN 1745-3674· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,003 of 33,995 indexed journals
6 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 30
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name acta orthop
Abbreviated Name acta orthopaedica
ISSN 1745-3674

Publications Per Year

Articles (6)

2018
Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016
Spekenbrink-Spooren, Anneke;Steenbergen, Liza N Van;Denissen, Geke A W;Swierstra, Bart A;Poolman, Rudolf W;Nelissen, Rob G H H;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 640-645
654 views Abstract
2017
Posterior approach compared to direct lateral approach resulted in better patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: 20,908 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register
Kristensen, Torbjørn B;Vinje, Tarjei;Havelin, Leif I;Engesæter, Lars B;Gjertsen, Jan-Erik;
Vol. 88 , No. 1 , pp. 29-34
509 views Abstract
2018
Time of admission and mortality after hip fracture: a detailed look at the weekend effect in a nationwide study of 55,211 hip fracture patients in Norway
Andreas Asheim,Sara Marie Nilsen,Marlen Toch-Marquardt,Kjartan Sarheim Anthun,Lars Gunnar Johnsen,Johan H Bjørngaard;Andreas Asheim;Sara Marie Nilsen;Marlen Toch-Marquardt;Kjartan Sarheim Anthun;Lars Gunnar Johnsen;Johan H Bjørngaard;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 610-614
484 views DOI Abstract
2017
Peripheral snap-fit locking mechanisms and smooth surface finish of tibial trays reduce backside wear in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A retrieval analysis of 102 inlays
Łapaj, Łukasz;Mróz, Adrian;Kokoszka, Paweł;Markuszewski, Jacek;Wendland, Justyna;Helak-Łapaj, Celina;Kruczyński, Jacek;
Vol. 88 , No. 1 , pp. 62-69
433 views Abstract
2016
Routine functional assessment for hip fracture patients: Are there sufficient predictive properties for subgroup identification in treatment and rehabilitation?
Pedersen, T.
Vol. 87 , pp. 374-379
301 views DOI
2018
Trauma simulation training: a randomized controlled trial -evaluating the effectiveness of the Imperial Femoral Intramedullary Nailing Cognitive Task Analysis (IFINCTA) tool.
Bhattacharyya, Rahul;Sugand, Kapil;Al-Obaidi, Bilal;Sinha, Ian;Bhattacharya, Rajarshi;Gupte, Chinmay M;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 689-695
270 views DOI Abstract
2018
Time of admission and mortality after hip fracture: a detailed look at the weekend effect in a nationwide study of 55,211 hip fracture patients in Norway
Andreas Asheim,Sara Marie Nilsen,Marlen Toch-Marquardt,Kjartan Sarheim Anthun,Lars Gunnar Johnsen,Johan H Bjørngaard;Andreas Asheim;Sara Marie Nilsen;Marlen Toch-Marquardt;Kjartan Sarheim Anthun;Lars Gunnar Johnsen;Johan H Bjørngaard;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 610-614
484 views DOI Abstract
2018
Trauma simulation training: a randomized controlled trial -evaluating the effectiveness of the Imperial Femoral Intramedullary Nailing Cognitive Task Analysis (IFINCTA) tool.
Bhattacharyya, Rahul;Sugand, Kapil;Al-Obaidi, Bilal;Sinha, Ian;Bhattacharya, Rajarshi;Gupte, Chinmay M;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 689-695
270 views DOI Abstract
2018
Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016
Spekenbrink-Spooren, Anneke;Steenbergen, Liza N Van;Denissen, Geke A W;Swierstra, Bart A;Poolman, Rudolf W;Nelissen, Rob G H H;
Vol. 89 , No. 6 , pp. 640-645
654 views Abstract
2017
Posterior approach compared to direct lateral approach resulted in better patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: 20,908 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register
Kristensen, Torbjørn B;Vinje, Tarjei;Havelin, Leif I;Engesæter, Lars B;Gjertsen, Jan-Erik;
Vol. 88 , No. 1 , pp. 29-34
509 views Abstract
2017
Peripheral snap-fit locking mechanisms and smooth surface finish of tibial trays reduce backside wear in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A retrieval analysis of 102 inlays
Łapaj, Łukasz;Mróz, Adrian;Kokoszka, Paweł;Markuszewski, Jacek;Wendland, Justyna;Helak-Łapaj, Celina;Kruczyński, Jacek;
Vol. 88 , No. 1 , pp. 62-69
433 views Abstract
2016
Routine functional assessment for hip fracture patients: Are there sufficient predictive properties for subgroup identification in treatment and rehabilitation?
Pedersen, T.
Vol. 87 , pp. 374-379
301 views DOI
Journament Score
39.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,003 of 33,995
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.