teknik | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1725 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

teknik

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name teknik
Abbreviated Name teknik
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2017
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis b virus-infected patients
;Chang CM;Hsieh MS;Yang TC;Hsieh VC;Chiang JH;Huang HH;How CK;Hu SY;Yen DH
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 709-720
419 views Abstract
2018
checkpoint molecule pd-1-assisted cd8+ t lymphocyte count in tumor microenvironment predicts overall survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors
;Yao J;Xi W;Zhu Y;Wang H;Hu X;Guo J
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 3419-3431
402 views Abstract
2016
Pengembangan Transportasi Sungai Kota Semarang Sebagai Transportasi Perintis Tujuan Wisata Air (Studi Kasus Kanal Banjir Barat Kota Semarang)
Ismiyati, Ismiyati;Budieny, Hary;Narayudha, Moga;Salamun, Salamun;Putra, Anggara Dharma;Reka, Wiweka Reka Wiweka;
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 47-53
349 views Abstract
2020
mitochondrial stress–mediated targeting of quiescent cancer stem cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma
;Saluja TS;Kumar V;Agrawal M;Tripathi A;Meher RK;Srivastava K;Gupta A;Singh A;Chaturvedi A;Singh SK
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 4519-4530
339 views Abstract
2018
solute carrier transporters: potential targets for digestive system neoplasms
;Xie J;Zhu XY;Liu LM;Meng ZQ
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 153-166
304 views Abstract
2018
a novel mechanism of tumor-induced thymic atrophy in mice bearing h22 hepatocellular carcinoma
;Sun SJ;Ji HY;Feng YY;Kang Y;Yu J;Liu AJ
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 417-424
304 views Abstract
2018
treatment-related adverse effects with pazopanib, sorafenib and sunitinib in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a pooled analysis
;Que Y;Liang Y;Zhao JJ;Ding Y;Peng RQ;Guan YX;Zhang X
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 2141-2150
298 views Abstract
2018
stereotactic body radiation therapy plus induction or adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage but medically inoperable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of a prospectively collected database
;Zhu X;Li F;Liu W;Shi D;Ju X;Cao YS;Shen Y;Cao F;Qing S;Fang F;Jia Z;Zhang H
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 1295-1304
293 views Abstract
2020
pre/post-treatment dynamic of inflammatory markers has prognostic value in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma managed by stereotactic body radiation therapy
;Zhuang Y;Yuan BY;Hu Y;Chen GW;Zhang L;Zhao XM;Chen YX;Zeng ZC
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 10929-10937
265 views Abstract
2014
interstitial fluid flow in cancer: implications for disease progression and treatment
;Munson JM;Shieh AC
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 317-328
253 views Abstract
View All 28 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.