lasers in manufacturing and materials processing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#172 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 17 hours ago

lasers in manufacturing and materials processing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name lasers in manufacturing and materials processing
Abbreviated Name lasers in manufacturing and materials processing
ISSN 21967229
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/40516
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (220 total)

2017
adolescent exposure to methylphenidate increases impulsive choice later in life
;Zarish Abbas;Arwen Sweet;Giovanni Hernandez;Giovanni Hernandez;Giovanni Hernandez;Andreas Arvanitogiannis
Vol. 11 , pp. -
668 views DOI Abstract
2016
association between exposure to the chinese famine in different stages of early life and decline in cognitive functioning in adulthood
;Chao Wang;Yu An;Huanling Yu;Lingli Feng;Quanri Liu;Yanhui Lu;Hui Wang;Rong Xiao
Vol. 10 , pp. -
412 views DOI Abstract
2012
neurobehavioral phenotyping of gaq knockout mice reveals impairments in motor functions and spatial working memory without changes in anxiety or behavioral despair
;Aliya L Frederick;Aliya L Frederick;Tommy P Saborido;Tommy P Saborido;Gregg D Stanwood;Gregg D Stanwood;Gregg D Stanwood
Vol. 6 , pp. -
410 views DOI Abstract
2014
avoidance prone individuals self reporting behavioral inhibition exhibit facilitated acquisition and altered extinction of conditioned eyeblinks with partial reinforcement schedules
;Michael Todd Allen;Michael Todd Allen;Catherine E Myers;Catherine E Myers;Richard J Servatius;Richard J Servatius
Vol. 8 , pp. -
407 views DOI Abstract
2014
early life stress and macaque amygdala hypertrophy: preliminary evidence for a role for the serotonin transporter gene.
;Jeremy D Coplan;Hassan M Fathy;Andrea eJackowski;Cheuk Y Tang;Tarique D Perera;Sanjay J Mathew;Jose eMartinez;Chadi G Abdallah;Andrew J Dwork;Jack M Gorman;Charles B Nemeroff;Michael J Owens;Arie eKaffman;Joan eKaufman
Vol. 8 , pp. -
363 views DOI Abstract
2018
Impact of Liquid Medium on Laser Ablation Mechanism: Surface Heating and Cooling
Soliman W.
Vol. 5 , pp. 430-438
358 views DOI
2015
anterior insular cortex regulation in autism spectrum disorders
;Andrea eCaria;Andrea eCaria;Simona ede Falco
Vol. 9 , pp. -
358 views DOI Abstract
2015
allopregnanolone in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis modulates contextual fear in rats
;Naomi eNagaya;Naomi eNagaya;Gillian M. Acca;Stephen eMaren;Stephen eMaren
Vol. 9 , pp. -
352 views DOI Abstract
2013
spatial learning of female mice: a role of the mineralocorticoid receptor during stress and the estrous cycle
;Judith P Ter Horst;Jiska eKentrop;Marit eArp;Chantal J Hubens;E Ron de Kloet;Melly S Oitzl
Vol. 7 , pp. -
349 views DOI Abstract
2018
Impact of Liquid Medium on Laser Ablation Mechanism: Surface Heating and Cooling
Soliman W.
Vol. 5 , pp. 430-438
332 views DOI
View All 220 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.