journal of animal and plant sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4568 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

journal of animal and plant sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name journal of animal and plant sciences
Abbreviated Name journal of animal and plant sciences
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://thejaps.org.pk
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (106 total)

immunoexpression of cleaved caspase-3 shows lower apoptotic area indices in lip carcinomas than in intraoral cancer
;Ana Flávia Schueler de Assumpção LEITE;Vagner Gonçalves BERNARDO;Luisa Aguirre BUEXM;Eliene Carvalho da FONSECA;Licínio Esmeraldo da SILVA;Danielle Resende Camisasca BARROSO;Simone de Queiroz Chaves LOURENÇO
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 359-365
642 views DOI Abstract
2011
stress analysis of a fixed implant-supported denture by the finite element method (fem) when varying the number of teeth used as abutments
;Marcos Daniel Septímio Lanza;Paulo Isaías Seraidarian;Wellington Correa Jansen;Marcos Dias Lanza
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 655-661
558 views DOI Abstract
2012
effect of a multi-layer infection control barrier on the micro-hardness of a composite resin
;In-Nam Hwang;Sung-Ok Hong;Bin-Na Lee;Yun-Chan Hwang;Won-Mann Oh;Hoon-Sang Chang
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 576-580
466 views DOI Abstract
2010
in vivo efficacy of alkaline peroxide tablets and mouthwashes on candida albicans in patients with denture stomatitis
;Altay Uludamar;Yasemin Kulak Özkan;Tanju Kadir;Ismail Ceyhan
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 291-296
439 views DOI Abstract
2011
apoptosis and survivability of human dental pulp cells under exposure to bis-gma
;Junya Yano;Chiaki Kitamura;Tatsuji Nishihara;Masayuki Tokuda;Ayako Washio;Ker-Kong Chen;Masamichi Terashita
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 218-222
436 views DOI Abstract
the effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study
;Hakan Arslan;Ruslan Khalilov;Ezgi Doğanay;Ertugrul Karatas
Vol. 24 , No. 5 , pp. 503-508
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of olive leaf extract (Olea europea L.) on growth performance, blood metabolites and antioxidant activities in broiler chickens under heat stress
Agah, M.
Vol. 29 , pp. 657-666
429 views
2012
analysis of kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic patterns during root canal preparation with rotary and manual instruments
;Braulio Pasternak-Júnior;Manoel Damião de Sousa Neto;Valdeci Carlos Dionísio;Jesus Djalma Pécora;Ricardo Gariba Silva
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 57-63
428 views DOI Abstract
2012
a comparative evaluation of the efficacy of manual, magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments: an in vitro profilometric and sem study
;Sumita Singh;Ashita Uppoor;Dilip Nayak
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 21-26
426 views DOI Abstract
2008
maximum inhibitory dilution of mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine and polyhexamethylene biguanide against salivary staphylococcus aureus
;Andresa Piacezzi Nascimento;Juliane Maria Guerreiro Tanomaru;Fumio Matoba-Júnior;Evandro Watanabe;Mario Tanomaru-Filho;Izabel Yoko Ito
Vol. 16 , No. 5 , pp. 336-339
399 views DOI Abstract
View All 106 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.