scientia horticulturae | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2225 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

scientia horticulturae

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name scientia horticulturae
Abbreviated Name scientia horticulturae
ISSN 0304-4238
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/scientia-horticulturae
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (75 total)

2019
Application of genomic tools to avocado (Persea americana) breeding: SNP discovery for genotyping and germplasm characterization
Kuhn D.
Vol. 246 , pp. 1-11
532 views DOI
2017
Effects of heat shock and nitrogen shock pre-treatments on ripening heterogeneity of Hass avocados stored in controlled atmosphere
Hernández I.
Vol. 225 , pp. 408-415
388 views DOI
2019
Comparing ‘Iriet’ and ‘Ettinger’ avocado cultivars as pollinators of ‘Hass’ using SNPs for paternal identification
Stahl P.
Vol. 248 , pp. 50-57
368 views DOI
2018
Avocado fertilization: Matching the periodic demand for nutrients
Silber A.
Vol. 241 , pp. 231-240
358 views DOI
2018
Characterization of interspecific hybrids between flowering Chinese cabbage and broccoli
Wei Y.
Vol. 240 , pp. 552-557
340 views DOI
2019
Protein content, antioxidant activity, carbohydrates and photosynthesis in leaves of girdled stems of four olive cultivars
Annabi K.
Vol. 256 , pp. 0-0
330 views DOI
2017
Carboxyl methylcellulose (CMC) containing moringa plant extracts as new postharvest organic edible coating for Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) fruit
Tesfay S.
Vol. 226 , pp. 201-207
330 views DOI
2019
Protein content, antioxidant activity, carbohydrates and photosynthesis in leaves of girdled stems of four olive cultivars
Annabi, K.
Vol. 256 , pp. 0-0
321 views DOI
2019
Cross- vs. self-pollination in ‘Hass’ avocados growing in coastal and inland orchards of Southern California
Davenport T.
Vol. 246 , pp. 307-316
311 views DOI
2020
Effects of integrated use of residual sulfur-enhanced biochar with effective microorganisms on soil properties, plant growth and short-term productivity of Capsicum annuum under salt stress
Abd, El-Mageed T.
Vol. 261 , pp. 0-0
293 views DOI
View All 75 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

29.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.