Indexed in Journament

journal of the american society of nephrology : jasn

ISSN 1533-3450· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,903 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
7 Articles
Scores higher than 90.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j am soc nephrol
Abbreviated Name j am soc nephrol
ISSN 1533-3450

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 44.4
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 89.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of the american society of nephrology : jasn
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 44.4 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.9 7.8
Content Distribution 89.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (7)

2019
Comparative Cardiac Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 611-623
456 views DOI Abstract
2014
Key concepts and limitations of statistical methods for evaluating biomarkers of kidney disease
Vol. 25 , No. 8 , pp. -
425 views Abstract
2019
APOL1 Kidney Risk Variants Induce Cell Death Mitochondrial Translocation and Opening of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore.
373 views DOI Abstract
2018
Financial Costs Incurred by Living Kidney Donors: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Vol. 29 , No. 12 , pp. 2847-2857
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Novel Role for GATA3 in Mesangial Cells in Glomerular Development and Injury.
Vol. 30 , No. 9 , pp. 1641-1658
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Computational Segmentation and Classification of Diabetic Glomerulosclerosis.
307 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bundled Payment Reform and Dialysis Facility Closures in ESKD.
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bundled Payment Reform and Dialysis Facility Closures in ESKD.
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
APOL1 Kidney Risk Variants Induce Cell Death Mitochondrial Translocation and Opening of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore.
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparative Cardiac Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 611-623
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Novel Role for GATA3 in Mesangial Cells in Glomerular Development and Injury.
Vol. 30 , No. 9 , pp. 1641-1658
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Computational Segmentation and Classification of Diabetic Glomerulosclerosis.
307 views DOI Abstract
2018
Financial Costs Incurred by Living Kidney Donors: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Vol. 29 , No. 12 , pp. 2847-2857
356 views DOI Abstract
2014
Key concepts and limitations of statistical methods for evaluating biomarkers of kidney disease
Vol. 25 , No. 8 , pp. -
425 views Abstract
Journament Score
41.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,903 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

44.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

89.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.