Indexed in Journament

journal of physical chemistry a

ISSN 1089-5639· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,800 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
129 Articles
Scores higher than 25.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of physical chemistry a
Abbreviated Name journal of physical chemistry a
ISSN 1089-5639
URL http://pubs.acs.org/journal/jpcafh

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of physical chemistry a
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 3.6 7.8
Content Distribution 71.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (129)

2012
familial glucocorticoid deficiency presenting with generalized hyperpigmentation in adolescence. report of three siblings
Vol. 16 , No. 8 , pp. 382-384
569 views DOI Abstract
2014
waist height ratio: a universal screening tool for prediction of metabolic syndrome in urban and rural population of haryana
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 394-399
479 views DOI Abstract
2015
status of iodine nutrition among pregnant mothers in selected districts of uttarakhand, india
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 106-109
450 views DOI Abstract
2017
the serological and biochemical markers of adrenal cortex and endocrine pancreas dysfunction in patients with hashimoto's thyroiditis: a hospital-based pilot study
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 540-544
437 views DOI Abstract
2016
neck height ratio is an important predictor of metabolic syndrome among asian indians
Vol. 20 , No. 6 , pp. 831-837
399 views DOI Abstract
2014
arterial stiffness in obese children: role of adiposity and physical activity
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 70-76
376 views DOI Abstract
2014
intravenous iron replacement therapy in eugonadal males with iron-deficiency anemia: effects on pituitary gonadal axis and sperm parameters; a pilot study
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 310-316
371 views DOI Abstract
2015
knowledge of hypoglycemia and its associated factors among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a tertiary care hospital in south india
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 378-382
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Electron Localization Function and Compton Profiles of Cu<inf>2</inf>O
Vol. 123 , pp. 1999-2007
137 views DOI
2018
characterization of metabolic parameters in responders and nonresponders treated with canagliflozin monotherapy in drug-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 185-190
243 views DOI Abstract
2018
advanced diabetic nephropathy with “clean” eyes: an extreme phenotype
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 274-276
316 views DOI Abstract
2018
congenital hypothyroidism screening in term neonates using umbilical cord blood tsh values
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 277-279
316 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,800 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.