Indexed in Journament

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)

ISSN 1806-9282· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.7/100
Journament Score
#8,026
Journament Rank
8
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)
Abbreviated Name rev assoc med bras (1992)
ISSN 1806-9282

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS syndrome).
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 227-30
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Response to direct-acting antiviral agents in chronic hepatitis C patients with end-stage renal disease: a clinical experience.
Vol. 65 , No. 12 , pp. 1470-1475
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ameliorative effect of certolizumab on experimentally induced acute necrotic pancreatitis in rats.
Vol. 65 , No. 2 , pp. 204-210
304 views DOI Abstract
2020
HIV-related nephropathy: new aspects of an old paradigm.
Vol. 66Suppl 1 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. s75-s81
267 views DOI Abstract
2017
Therapeutic use of the rebound effect of modern drugs: "New homeopathic medicines".
Vol. 63 , No. 2 , pp. 100-108
222 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comment on "The importance of physical exercise during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic".
Vol. 66 , No. 9 , pp. 1311-1313
166 views DOI Abstract
2022
Serum Prealbumin: a potential predictor of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in patients receiving programmed hemodialysis.
Vol. 68 , No. 6 , pp. 792-796
163 views DOI Abstract
2021
The value of C-reactive protein/albumin, fibrinogen/albumin, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios in predicting the severity of CoVID-19.
Vol. 67 , No. 3 , pp. 431-436
133 views DOI Abstract
2022
Serum Prealbumin: a potential predictor of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in patients receiving programmed hemodialysis.
Vol. 68 , No. 6 , pp. 792-796
163 views DOI Abstract
2021
The value of C-reactive protein/albumin, fibrinogen/albumin, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios in predicting the severity of CoVID-19.
Vol. 67 , No. 3 , pp. 431-436
133 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comment on "The importance of physical exercise during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic".
Vol. 66 , No. 9 , pp. 1311-1313
166 views DOI Abstract
2020
HIV-related nephropathy: new aspects of an old paradigm.
Vol. 66Suppl 1 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. s75-s81
267 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ameliorative effect of certolizumab on experimentally induced acute necrotic pancreatitis in rats.
Vol. 65 , No. 2 , pp. 204-210
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
Response to direct-acting antiviral agents in chronic hepatitis C patients with end-stage renal disease: a clinical experience.
Vol. 65 , No. 12 , pp. 1470-1475
324 views DOI Abstract
2017
Therapeutic use of the rebound effect of modern drugs: "New homeopathic medicines".
Vol. 63 , No. 2 , pp. 100-108
222 views DOI Abstract
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS syndrome).
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 227-30
378 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.