Indexed in Journament

Journal of endourology

ISSN 1557-900X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,595 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
51 Articles
Scores higher than 36.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Endourol
Abbreviated Name j endourol
ISSN 1557-900X
URL http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0892-7790;screen=info;ECOIP

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of endourology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 11.1 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 12.1 13.4
Content Distribution 64.8 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (51)

2019
Device Malfunctions and Complications Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery: Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.
Vol. 33 , No. 6 , pp. 448-454
439 views DOI Abstract
2019
Standardization of 532 nm Laser Terminology for Surgery in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): A Systematic Review.
411 views DOI Abstract
2010
marine actinomycetes screening of banten west coast and their antibiotics purification
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 176-181
399 views Abstract
2019
Preventing Excess Narcotic Prescriptions in New Robotic Surgery Discharges: The PENN Prospective Cohort Quality Improvement Initiative.
388 views DOI Abstract
2008
Protective effect of a potent antioxidant, pomegranate juice, in the kidney of rats with nephrolithiasis induced by ethylene glycol.
Vol. 22 , No. 12 , pp. 2723-31
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Lasers Ablate Stones: In-vitro Study of Laser Lithotripsy (Ho:YAG and Tm-fiber lasers) in Different Environments.
367 views DOI Abstract
2006
viability of encapsulated lactobacillus sp. mar 8
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 114-117
346 views Abstract
2009
extraction of coconut oil (cocos nucifera l.) through fermentation system
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 151-157
310 views Abstract
2008
2018
Competency-Based Training and Simulation: Making a "Valid" Argument.
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 84-93
301 views DOI Abstract
2021
The Predictive Factors For Readmission And Rehospitalization After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. The Results of RIRSearch study group.
275 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimizing the Financial Burden of the Approach to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
242 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Lasers Ablate Stones: In-vitro Study of Laser Lithotripsy (Ho:YAG and Tm-fiber lasers) in Different Environments.
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Standardization of 532 nm Laser Terminology for Surgery in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): A Systematic Review.
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Post-Operative Emergency Department Visits After Urinary Stone Surgery: Variation Based on Surgical Modality.
178 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preventing Excess Narcotic Prescriptions in New Robotic Surgery Discharges: The PENN Prospective Cohort Quality Improvement Initiative.
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Device Malfunctions and Complications Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery: Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.
Vol. 33 , No. 6 , pp. 448-454
439 views DOI Abstract
2018
Competency-Based Training and Simulation: Making a "Valid" Argument.
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 84-93
301 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,595 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.