Indexed in Journament

eurasian chemico-technological journal 

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,741 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
109 Articles
Scores higher than 32.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eurasian chemico-technological journal 
Abbreviated Name eurasian chemico-technological journal 
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 46.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for eurasian chemico-technological journal 
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 46.9 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (109)

2017
a score-based performance assessment of maternal and child health services provided by usha of rajkot city
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. 97-101
650 views DOI Abstract
2013
influence of socioeconomic status on in-hospital mortality and morbidity after stroke in india: retrospective hospital-based cohort study
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 39-41
589 views DOI Abstract
2016
uterine rupture: a seven year review at a tertiary care hospital in new delhi, india
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 45-49
436 views DOI Abstract
2012
Oxidation of 3- and 4-Methylpyridines on Vanadium-Anatase and Vanadium-Rutile Catalysts
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 337-342
428 views Abstract
2009
assessment of risk factors for development of type-ii diabetes mellitus among working women in berhampur, orissa
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 232-236
428 views Abstract
2018
impact of wastewater-irrigated urban agriculture on diarrhea incidence in ahmedabad, india
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 102-106
381 views DOI Abstract
2015
prevalence of obesity among male adolescents in arar saudi arabia: future risk of cardiovascular disease
Vol. 40 , No. 3 , pp. 182-187
379 views DOI Abstract
2009
teenage pregnancy: a socially inflicted health hazard
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 227-231
333 views Abstract
2018
effects of sociodemographic factors and work-related stress on work ability index among stone quarry workers in a rural area: a cross-sectional study
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 124-125
293 views DOI
2018
impact of wastewater-irrigated urban agriculture on diarrhea incidence in ahmedabad, india
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 102-106
381 views DOI Abstract
2017
a score-based performance assessment of maternal and child health services provided by usha of rajkot city
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. 97-101
650 views DOI Abstract
2016
public health approaches to noncommunicable diseases
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 76-76
174 views
2016
risk factors for dots treatment default among new hiv-tb coinfected patients in nalgonda (dist.) telangana (state): a case control study
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. 120-125
26 views DOI Abstract
2016
towards a better health care delivery system: the tamil nadu model
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 302-304
216 views DOI Abstract
2016
uterine rupture: a seven year review at a tertiary care hospital in new delhi, india
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 45-49
436 views DOI Abstract
2016
profiles and factors associated with poor glycemic control among inpatients with diabetes mellitus type 2 as a primary diagnosis in a teaching hospital
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 208-212
223 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,741 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

46.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.