eurasian chemico-technological journal  | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8987 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

eurasian chemico-technological journal 

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name eurasian chemico-technological journal 
Abbreviated Name eurasian chemico-technological journal 
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (109 total)

2017
a score-based performance assessment of maternal and child health services provided by usha of rajkot city
;Ankit M Sheth;Anupam Banerjee;Amiruddin M Kadri;Matib Rangoonwala;Dipeshkumar D Zalavadiya;Niravkumar B Joshi
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. 97-101
631 views DOI Abstract
2016
utilization of services under janani shishu suraksha karyakram for institutional deliveries in the public sector facilities, sirmaur district, himachal pradesh, india
;Uvi Tyagi;Kamaraj Pattabi;Prabhdeep Kaur
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 65-68
615 views DOI Abstract
2013
influence of socioeconomic status on in-hospital mortality and morbidity after stroke in india: retrospective hospital-based cohort study
;Ravi Yadav;Kameshwar Prasad;Vasantha M Padma;Achal Kumar Srivastava;Manjari Tripathi;Rohit Bhatia
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 39-41
579 views DOI Abstract
2016
uterine rupture: a seven year review at a tertiary care hospital in new delhi, india
;Maruti Sinha;Ridhima Gupta;Pushpender Gupta;Rekha Rani;Ramanjeet Kaur;Rahil Singh
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 45-49
413 views DOI Abstract
2012
Oxidation of 3- and 4-Methylpyridines on Vanadium-Anatase and Vanadium-Rutile Catalysts
Yugay, O. K.;Mikhailovskaya, T. P.;Sembaev, D. Kh.;Vorobyev, P. B.;
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 337-342
413 views Abstract
2009
assessment of risk factors for development of type-ii diabetes mellitus among working women in berhampur, orissa
;Malini D;Sahu A;Mohapatro Swapna;Tripathy R
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 232-236
409 views Abstract
2008
overweight and obesity and their association with dietary habits, and sociodemographic characteristics among male primary school children in al-hassa, kingdom of saudi arabia
;Amin Tarek;Al-Sultan Ali;Ali Ayub
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 172-181
391 views Abstract
2015
prevalence of obesity among male adolescents in arar saudi arabia: future risk of cardiovascular disease
;Shehab A Alenazi;Hala M Koura;Sherif M Zaki;Ayman H Mohamed
Vol. 40 , No. 3 , pp. 182-187
368 views DOI Abstract
2018
impact of wastewater-irrigated urban agriculture on diarrhea incidence in ahmedabad, india
;Timo Falkenberg;Deepak Saxena
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 102-106
349 views DOI Abstract
2009
teenage pregnancy: a socially inflicted health hazard
;Banerjee Bratati;Pandey G;Dutt Debashis;Sengupta Bhaswati;Mondal Maitraeyi;Deb Sila
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 227-231
312 views Abstract
View All 109 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.