Indexed in Journament

bulletin des sociétés chimiques belges

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.6/100
Journament Score
#10,324
Journament Rank
65
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name bulletin des sociétés chimiques belges
Abbreviated Name bulletin des sociétés chimiques belges

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (65)

2014
between pain and pleasure: pregnant women′s knowledge and preferences for pain relief in labor, a pilot study from zaria, northern nigeria
;Elizabeth O Ogboli-Nwasor;Sunday E Adaji
Vol. 8 , No. 5 , pp. 20-24
489 views DOI Abstract
2011
preanesthetic medication in children: a comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam
;Ashraf M Ghali;Abdul Kader Mahfouz;Maher Al-Bahrani
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 387-391
437 views DOI Abstract
2014
effect of clonidine versus dexmedetomidine on pain control after laparoscopic gastric sleeve: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study
;Zoher M Naja;Rania Khatib;Fouad M Ziade;Georges Moussa;Zeina Z Naja;Ahmad Salah Eddine Naja;Saleh Kanawati
Vol. 8 , No. 5 , pp. 57-62
424 views DOI Abstract
2015
evaluating the quality of intravenous regional anesthesia following adding dexamethasone to lidocaine
;Ebrahim Hassani;Alireza Mahoori;Mir Mousa Aghdashi;Habibollah Pirnejad
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 418-421
409 views DOI Abstract
2013
survival rate in patients after sudden cardiac arrest at the university hospital of northern norway treated with or without opioids: a retrospective evaluation
;Vladimir Kuklin
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 310-314
407 views DOI Abstract
2013
hemiarthroplasty in high risk elderly patient under epidural anesthesia with 0.75% ropivacaine-fentanyl versus 0.5% bupivacaine-fentanyl: clinical trial
;Bhawna Rastogi;Kumkum Gupta;Avinash Rastogi;Prashant K Gupta;Apoorva B Singhal;Ivesh Singh
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 142-145
369 views DOI Abstract
2017
ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral block versus local anesthesia for medical thoracoscopy
;Maha A Abo-Zeid;Mohammad M Elgamal;Asem A Hewidy;Amro A Moawad;Alaa Eldin Adel Elmaddawy
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 442-448
356 views DOI Abstract
2014
postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis: a comparative study of ondansetron, granisetron and granisetron and dexamethasone combination after modified radical mastectomy
;Pushplata Gupta;Shilpi Jain
Vol. 8 , No. 5 , pp. 67-71
340 views DOI Abstract
2013
comparative evaluation of two doses of tranexamic acid used prophylactically in anemic parturients for lower segment cesarean section: a double-blind randomized case control prospective trial
;Upasana Goswami;Sushmita Sarangi;Sunali Gupta;Savita Babbar
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 427-431
330 views DOI Abstract
2011
accidental five fold overdose of propofol for induction in a 38-days-old infant undergoing emergency bilateral inguinal hernia repair
;Mahin Seyedhejazi;Ghafur Abafattash;Reza Taheri
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 417-418
320 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluation of the neurotoxicity of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on rat spinal cord (electromicroscopic observations)
;Dilek Ozdamar;Huban Dayıoglu;Ihsan Anık;Seyhun Solakoglu;Mine Solak;Kamil Toker
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 10-15
224 views DOI Abstract
2017
ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral block versus local anesthesia for medical thoracoscopy
;Maha A Abo-Zeid;Mohammad M Elgamal;Asem A Hewidy;Amro A Moawad;Alaa Eldin Adel Elmaddawy
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 442-448
356 views DOI Abstract
2017
digital assistance of nasogastric tube insertion in intubated patients under general anesthesia: a single-blinded prospective randomized study
;Alrefaey Kandeel;Mohammed Elmorhedi;Usama Abdalla
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 283-286
111 views DOI Abstract
2016
the correlation between body mass index, limb circumferences and blood pressure cuff fit in bariatric surgical patients
;R Schumann;O Alyamani;A Viswanath;I Bonney
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 182-186
36 views DOI Abstract
2016
multiple pterygium syndrome: challenge for anesthesiologist
;P Sethi;P K Bhatia;N Gupta;K Singh
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 350-352
2 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparative effect of propofol versus sevoflurane on renal ischemia/reperfusion injury after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
;A S Ammar;K M Mahmoud
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 301-307
213 views DOI Abstract
2016
complete airway obstruction with inferior turbinate avulsion after nasotracheal intubation
;Vipin Kumar Goyal;Sohan Lal Solanki;Amrita U Parekh;Prakash Gupta
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 114-115
247 views DOI
2016
another utility of signature capnogram: detection of sodalime canister detachment from anesthesia machine
;Sanjay Kumar;Manjaree Mishra;Amrita Bhattacharyya
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 483-485
160 views DOI
2016
inadvertent intrathecal injection of labetalol
;S Verma;P K Bhatia;V Sharma;P Sethi
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 345-346
120 views DOI Abstract
2015
conscious sedation for middle ear surgeries: a comparison between fentanyl-propofol and fentanyl-midazolam infusion
;Raghu S Thota;Manasi Ambardekar;Priyamvada Likhate
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 117-121
260 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.