Indexed in Journament

journal of crystal and molecular structure

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,613 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
20 Articles
Scores higher than 12.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of crystal and molecular structure
Abbreviated Name journal of crystal and molecular structure

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 49.5
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 68.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 49.5 27.4
Community Impact 3.6 7.8
Content Distribution 68.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2010
the social and intellectual dimensions in the construction of scientific knowledge: the institutional theory in organization studies in brazil
;Edson Ronaldo Guarido Filho;Clóvis L. Machado-da-Silva;Luciano Rossoni
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 136-154
355 views Abstract
2005
how to deal with negative publicity: the importance of consumer involvement
;Celso Augusto de Matos;Ricardo Teixeira Veiga
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 57-72
298 views Abstract
2010
development-based trust: proposing and validating a new trust measurement model for buyer-seller relationships
;José Mauro da Costa Hernandez;Claudia Cincotto dos Santos
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 172-197
283 views Abstract
1977
Crystal and molecular structure of 2′,2′,4,4,5′,5′,6,6-octamethyl-2′,4,5′,6-tetrahydrofuro[3,4-d]-1, 3-oxathiol-2-spiro-3′-furan-4′-(3′H)-one
Cheng, P.
Vol. 7 , pp. 115-121
279 views DOI
2017
mind the gap: lessons from the uk to brazil about the roles of ttos throughout collaborative r&d projects
;Elisa Thomas;Luciana Marques Vieira;Alsones Balestrin
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. e170048-
259 views DOI Abstract
2017
career profiles of generation y and their potential influencers
;Helena Talita Dante Cordeiro;Lindolfo Galvão de Albuquerque
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. e170013-
249 views DOI Abstract
2013
determinants of the capital structure of small and medium sized brazilian enterprises
;Denis Forte;Lucas Ayres Barros;Wilson Toshiro Nakamura
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 347-369
249 views Abstract
2008
interactions between corporate governance, bankruptcy law and firms debt financing: the brazilian case
;Bruno Funchal;Fernando Caio Galdi;Alexsandro Broedel Lopes
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 245-259
242 views Abstract
2007
three neofunctionalist conceptual contributions to the institutional theory in organizations
;João Marcelo Crubellate
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 66-81
233 views Abstract
2017
ethical decision-making: the role of self-monitoring, future orientation, and social networks
;Ana Carla Bon;Roger James Volkema;Jorge Ferreira da Silva
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1-19
231 views DOI Abstract
2017
ethical decision-making: the role of self-monitoring, future orientation, and social networks
;Ana Carla Bon;Roger James Volkema;Jorge Ferreira da Silva
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1-19
231 views DOI Abstract
2017
mind the gap: lessons from the uk to brazil about the roles of ttos throughout collaborative r&d projects
;Elisa Thomas;Luciana Marques Vieira;Alsones Balestrin
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. e170048-
259 views DOI Abstract
2017
career profiles of generation y and their potential influencers
;Helena Talita Dante Cordeiro;Lindolfo Galvão de Albuquerque
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. e170013-
249 views DOI Abstract
2016
regional cluster, innovation and export performance: an empirical study
;Alexandre Luis Prim;Mohamed Amal;Luciano Carvalho
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. e160028-
124 views DOI Abstract
2016
private equity and venture capital funds: what drives the demand and supply?
;Ricardo dos Santos Dias;Marcelo Alvaro da Silva Macedo
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. e150058-
162 views DOI Abstract
2015
the relationship between manufacturer and distributors: knowledge transfer and performance
;Emir José Redaelli;Ely Laureano Paiva;Rafael Teixeira
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 421-441
126 views DOI Abstract
2014
effects of internationalization on ownership structure: evidence from latin american firms
;Hsia Hua Sheng;Vinícius Silva Pereira
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 323-339
176 views DOI Abstract
2013
determinants of the capital structure of small and medium sized brazilian enterprises
;Denis Forte;Lucas Ayres Barros;Wilson Toshiro Nakamura
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 347-369
249 views Abstract
2012
demand for life annuities: a brazilian perspective
;Thalita Amorim Vaz;Sérgio Jurandyr Machado;Adriana Bruscato Bortoluzzo
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 441-453
162 views Abstract
2011
the relationship between manufacturing integration and performance from an activity-oriented perspective
;Ely Laureano Paiva;Iuri Gavronski;Livia Castro D'Avila
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 376-394
130 views Abstract
Journament Score
27.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,613 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

27.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

49.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.