Indexed in Journament

digest journal of nanomaterials and biostructures

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,745 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
73 Articles
Scores higher than 59.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name digest journal of nanomaterials and biostructures
Abbreviated Name digest journal of nanomaterials and biostructures
URL https://chalcogen.ro/index.php/journals/digest-journal-of-nanomaterials-and-biostructures

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 35.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 72.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for digest journal of nanomaterials and biostructures
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 35.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 2.9 13.4
Content Distribution 72.0 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (73)

2016
the interplay of post-translational modification and gene therapy
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 861-871
345 views Abstract
2018
pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of a telmisartan/s-amlodipine fixed-dose combination (ckd-828) formulation and coadministered telmisartan and s-amlodipine in healthy subjects
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 545-553
321 views Abstract
2020
2017
eluxadoline in the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 2827-2840
308 views Abstract
2014
topical pimecrolimus inhibits high-dose uvb irradiation-induced epidermal langerhans cell migration, via regulation of tnf-a and e-cadherin
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 1817-1825
308 views Abstract
2018
pharmacological activities, mechanisms of action, and safety of salidroside in the central nervous system
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 1479-1489
305 views Abstract
2016
simultaneous targeting of myd88 and nur77 as an effective approach for the treatment of inflammatory diseases
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1557-1572
305 views Abstract
2017
comparison of posttransplant outcomes in patients with no, acute, or chronic amiodarone use before heart transplantation
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 1827-1837
304 views Abstract
2017
bioequivalence study of a new sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film compared to the conventional film-coated 100 mg tablet administered to healthy male volunteers
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 1183-1192
300 views Abstract
2020
2018
development of novel rosuvastatin nanostructured lipid carriers for oral delivery in an animal model
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 2241-2248
242 views Abstract
2018
pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of a telmisartan/s-amlodipine fixed-dose combination (ckd-828) formulation and coadministered telmisartan and s-amlodipine in healthy subjects
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 545-553
321 views Abstract
2018
antihyperlipidemic studies of newly synthesized phenolic derivatives: in silico and in vivo approaches
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 2443-2453
222 views Abstract
2018
efficacy of atorvastatin on the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 437-444
261 views Abstract
2018
current research for a vaccine against lassa hemorrhagic fever virus
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 2519-2527
276 views Abstract
2018
durvalumab: an investigational anti-pd-l1 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 209-215
288 views Abstract
2018
pharmacological activities, mechanisms of action, and safety of salidroside in the central nervous system
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 1479-1489
305 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,745 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.