Indexed in Journament

human resources for health

ISSN 1478-4491· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #484 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
23 Articles
Scores higher than 98.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Abbreviated Name hum resour health
ISSN 1478-4491

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 62.2
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 81.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for human resources for health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 62.2 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.1 7.8
Content Distribution 81.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (23)

2019
Cambodia's health professionals and the ASEAN Mutual Recognition Arrangements: registration, education and mobility.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 14
504 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role and scope of practice of midwives in humanitarian settings: a systematic review and content analysis.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 5
492 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient satisfaction with physician assistant/associate care: an international scoping review.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 104
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
Remote health workforce turnover and retention: what are the policy and practice priorities?
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 99
458 views DOI Abstract
2019
Turnover intention of hospital staff in Ontario, Canada: exploring the role of frontline supervisors, teamwork, and mindful organizing.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 66
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
Workforce requirements for comprehensive ischaemic stroke care in a developing country: the case of Saudi Arabia.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 90
395 views DOI Abstract
2020
Task shifting for point-of-care early infant diagnosis: a comparison of the quality of testing between nurses and laboratory personnel in Zimbabwe.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 4
325 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nurse staffing in large general hospitals in China: an observational study.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 3
210 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Critical success factors for the implementation and adoption of e-learning for junior health care workers in Dadaab refugee camp Kenya.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 98
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient satisfaction with physician assistant/associate care: an international scoping review.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 104
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
Transforming tuberculosis (TB) service delivery model in China: issues and challenges for health workforce.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 83
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Medical tourism will…obligate physicians to elevate their level so that they can compete": a qualitative exploration of the anticipated impacts of inbound medical tourism on health human resources in Guatemala.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 53
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Remote health workforce turnover and retention: what are the policy and practice priorities?
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 99
458 views DOI Abstract
2019
Workforce requirements for comprehensive ischaemic stroke care in a developing country: the case of Saudi Arabia.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 90
395 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
43.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #484 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

43.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

62.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.