journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the international association of oral pathologists and the american academy of oral pathology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1535 / 33,934
📉 Poor
Overall Score
33.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the international association of oral pathologists and the american academy of oral pathology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name j oral pathol med
Abbreviated Name j oral pathol med
ISSN 1600-0714
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/16000714
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2019
RALBP1 regulates oral cancer cells via Akt and is a novel target of miR-148a-3p and miR-148b-3p.
Ieong, ChengCheng;Ma, Junpeng;Lai, Wenli;
327 views DOI Abstract
2008
Natural history of potentially malignant oral lesions and conditions: an overview of the literature
Napier SS;Speight PM;;
Vol. 37 , No. 1 , pp. -
295 views Abstract
2009
on the liu and almost unbiased liu estimators in the presence of multicollinearity with heteroscedastic or correlated errors
;Mustafa I. Alheety;B. M. Golam Kibria
Vol. 4 (2009) , pp. 155-167
266 views Abstract
2006
normal anti-invariant submanifolds of paraquaternionic kähler manifolds
;Novac-Claudiu Chiriac
Vol. 1 (2006) , pp. 99-109
182 views Abstract
2013
euler's constant, sequences and some estimates
;Alina Sîntămărian
Vol. 8 (2013) , pp. 103-114
157 views Abstract
2007
existence and uniqueness of the solution of the coupled conduction-radiation energy transfer on diffuse-gray surfaces
;Naji Qatanani;Amjad Barham;Qasem Heeh
Vol. 2 (2007) , pp. 43-58
152 views Abstract
2017
rc-class and lc-class on fixed point theorems for α-caristi type contraction mappings
;Arslan Hojat Ansari ;Muhammad Usman Ali
Vol. 12 (2017) , pp. 71-80
147 views Abstract
2009
enclosing roots of polynomial equations and their applications to iterative processes
;Saïd Hilout;Ioannis K. Argyros
Vol. 4 (2009) , pp. 119-132
133 views Abstract
2006
modeling seasonal time series
;Alexandra Colojoara
Vol. 1 (2006) , pp. 1-12
121 views Abstract
2010
fractional order differential inclusions on the half-line
;Mouffak Benchohra;Naima Hamidi
Vol. 5 (2010) , pp. 99-111
82 views Abstract
View All 17 Articles
34
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.