Indexed in Journament

telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the american telemedicine association

ISSN 1556-3669· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #954 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 96.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name telemed j e health
Abbreviated Name telemed j e health
ISSN 1556-3669

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 50.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 82.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the american telemedicine association
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 22.9
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 50.0 21.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 4.1
Content Distribution 82.3 88.8
Content Quality 55.1
Ethics & Transparency 40.5
Editorial Standards 33.0
Publication Regularity 52.9
Geographic Reach 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2019
How Has Teledentistry Been Applied in Public Dental Health Services? An Integrative Review.
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Remote Monitoring of Blood Pressure in Management of Urban Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Pediatric Telemedicine Response to a Natural Disaster.
428 views DOI Abstract
2020
Economic Evaluation of Robot-Based Telemedicine Consultation Services.
413 views DOI Abstract
2014
Improving stroke outcomes in rural areas through telestroke programs: an examination of barriers, facilitators, and state policies.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 3-10
411 views DOI Abstract
2017
Development and Validation of an Interactive Internet Platform for Older People: The Healthy Ageing Through Internet Counselling in the Elderly Study.
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 96-104
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Differentiation Strategy in Online Physician Competition: Does Specialization Matter?
386 views DOI Abstract
2020
Population Health Indicators Associated with a Statewide Telestroke Program.
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Population Health Indicators Associated with a Statewide Telestroke Program.
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Economic Evaluation of Robot-Based Telemedicine Consultation Services.
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Data Mining of the Reviews from Online Private Doctors.
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Differentiation Strategy in Online Physician Competition: Does Specialization Matter?
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Pediatric Telemedicine Response to a Natural Disaster.
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Has Teledentistry Been Applied in Public Dental Health Services? An Integrative Review.
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Differences in Health-Related Social Media Usage by Organizations and Individuals.
161 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Remote Monitoring of Blood Pressure in Management of Urban Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
Overview for Implementation of Telemedicine Services in a Large Integrated Multispecialty Health Care System.
269 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #954 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

50.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

82.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.