Indexed in Journament

molecular ecology resources

ISSN 1755-0998· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1/100
Journament Score
#11,697
Journament Rank
80
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name mol ecol resour
Abbreviated Name mol ecol resour
ISSN 1755-0998
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17550998

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (80)

2017
evaluation of optimum time for intravenous cannulation after sevoflurane induction of anesthesia in different pediatric age groups
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 371-374
577 views DOI Abstract
2012
a simple thermal pain model for the evaluation of analgesic activity in healthy subjects
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 214-220
489 views DOI Abstract
2019
ropivacaine plus lidocaine versus bupivacaine plus lidocaine for peribulbar block in cataract surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center, comparative clinical study
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 498-503
427 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative study of caudal clonidine and midazolam added to bupivacaine during infra-umbilical surgeries in children
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 241-247
417 views DOI Abstract
2011
psychiatric diseases: need for an increased awareness among the anesthesiologists
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 440-446
400 views DOI Abstract
2010
respiratory changes during spinal anaesthesia for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 475-479
338 views Abstract
2014
the association of gender and body mass index with postoperative pain scores when undergoing ankle fracture surgery
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 248-252
336 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparing slow and rapid bolus of ephedrine in pregnant patients undergoing planned cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 92-96
312 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sampling schemes and drift can bias admixture proportions inferred by structure
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. -
203 views DOI Abstract
2019
ropivacaine plus lidocaine versus bupivacaine plus lidocaine for peribulbar block in cataract surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center, comparative clinical study
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 498-503
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inferring introgression using RADseq and D : Power and pitfalls revealed in a case study of spiny lizards (Sceloporus).
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 818-837
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Incorporating phylogenetic metrics to microbial co-occurrence networks based on amplicon sequences to discern community assembly processes.
225 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cobble community DNA as a tool to monitor patterns of biodiversity within kelp forest ecosystems.
241 views DOI Abstract
2018
Draft genome and reference transcriptomic resources for the urticating pine defoliator Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae)
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. -
14 views DOI Abstract
2018
ratio of height-to-thyromental distance and ratio of height-to-sternomental distance as predictors of laryngoscopic grade in children
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 68-72
198 views DOI Abstract
2018
needle tip and peripheral nerve blocks
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 129-130
182 views
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.