journal of proteome research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1892 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of proteome research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j proteome res
Abbreviated Name journal of proteome research
ISSN 1535-3907
Aim and Scope
URL http://pubs.acs.org/journal/jprobs
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (51 total)

2008
<b> physical growth and body composition of students from distinct ethnic background of rio grande do sul state, brazil </b>
;Adriano Ferreti Borgatto;Adair da Silva Lopes;Ilca Maria Saldanha Diniz
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 12-18
578 views Abstract
2019
Multiorgan Systems Study Reveals Igfbp7 as a Suppressor of Gluconeogenesis after Gastric Bypass Surgery.
Arima, Naoaki;Sasaki, Yusuke;Lee, Lang Ho;Zhang, Hengmin;Figueiredo, Jose-Luiz;Mlynarchik, Andrew K;Qiao, Jiao;Yamada, Iwao;Higashi, Hideyuki;Ha, Anna H;Halu, Arda;Mizuno, Ken;Singh, Sasha A;Yamazaki, Yukiyoshi;Aikawa, Masanori;
496 views DOI Abstract
2003
references of physical growth for gaúchos and catarinenses adolescents
;Maria Fátima Glaner
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 17-26
480 views Abstract
2015
Systematic proteomic approach to characterize the impacts of chemical interactions on protein and cytotoxicity responses to metal mixture exposures.
Ge, Yue;Bruno, Maribel;Wallace, Kathleen;Leavitt, Sharon;Andrews, Debora;Spassova, Maria A;Xi, Mingyu;Roy, Anindya;Haykal-Coates, Najwa;Lefew, William;Swank, Adam;Winnik, Witold M;Chen, Chao;Woodard, Jonne;Farraj, Aimen;Teichman, Kevin Y;Ross, Jeffrey A;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 183-92
469 views DOI Abstract
2018
Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Minimally Alters Expression of Immunity and Metabolism Proteins in Hemolymph of Diaphorina citri, the Insect Vector of Huanglongbing.
Kruse, Angela;Ramsey, John S;Johnson, Richard;Hall, David G;MacCoss, Michael J;Heck, Michelle;
Vol. 17 , No. 9 , pp. 2995-3011
468 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of a Biomarker Panel for Early Detection of Lung Cancer Patients.
Geary, Bethany;Walker, Michael J;Snow, Joseph T;Lee, Dave C H;Pernemalm, Maria;Maleki-Dizaji, Saeedeh;Azadbakht, Narges;Apostolidou, Sophia;Barnes, Julie;Krysiak, Piotr;Shah, Rajesh;Booton, Richard;Dive, Caroline;Crosbie, Philip A;Whetton, Anthony D;
440 views DOI Abstract
2009
<b>validity and reliability of the one-mile walk test (the rockport fitness walk test) among 70-to-79 year old women</b>
;Priscila Marques
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 364-364
377 views Abstract
2018
Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Direct Infusion-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Combined Exploratory and Targeted Metabolic Profiling of Human Urine.
Chekmeneva, Elena;Dos Santos Correia, Gonçalo;Gómez-Romero, María;Stamler, Jeremiah;Chan, Queenie;Elliott, Paul;Nicholson, Jeremy K;Holmes, Elaine;
Vol. 17 , No. 10 , pp. 3492-3502
358 views DOI Abstract
2020
Extended Snake Cenomics by Top-Down In-Source Decay: Investigating the Newly Discovered Anatolian Meadow Viper Subspecies, .
Hempel, Benjamin-Florian;Damm, Maik;Mrinalini, Mrinalini;Göçmen, Bayram;Karış, Mert;Nalbantsoy, Ayse;Kini, R Manjunatha;Suessmuth, Roderich D;
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
MineXpert: Biological Mass Spectrometry Data Visualization and Mining with Full JavaScript Ability
Rusconi, F.
Vol. 18 , pp. 2254-2259
337 views DOI
View All 51 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.