kn - journal of cartography and geographic information | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4640 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

kn - journal of cartography and geographic information

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name kn - journal of cartography and geographic information
Abbreviated Name kn - journal of cartography and geographic information
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/42489
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2012
association between spasticity and the level of motor function with quality of life in community dwelling iranian young adults with spastic cerebral palsy
;Nasrin Salehi Dehno;Shohreh Noorizadeh Dehkordi;Mehdi Dadgoo;Masoud Salehi
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 150-156
345 views Abstract
2019
The Simplicity of Modern Audiovisual Web Cartography: An Example with the Open-Source JavaScript Library leaflet.js
Edler, D.
Vol. 69 , pp. 51-62
332 views DOI
2019
Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Road Accident Incidents and Delineation of Hotspots Using Geospatial Tools in Thrissur District, Kerala, India
Achu, A.
Vol. 69 , pp. 255-265
254 views DOI
2012
an overview of therapeutic approaches to brain tumor stem cells
;Alireza Khoshnevisan
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 31-40
222 views Abstract
2010
immunophenotype of peripheral blood lymphocytes following thermal injury in patients
;Tahereh Mousavi;Mohammad Ali Bahar;Kobra Z Entezami;Arezo khosravi
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 96-102
221 views Abstract
2011
illness perception of breastcancer in affected women undergoingchemotherapy
;Helen Sahebghalam;Somaieh Robubiat;Molood Bolurian;Hossein Shabahang;Ghazal Panahi;Gholamhossein Noferesti
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 76-81
216 views Abstract
2011
noscapine antagonizesvasoconstrictor action of bradykinin in isolated human umbilical artery
;Massoumeh Shafiei;Massoud Mahmoudian;Nahid Aboutaleb;Farahnaz Beiranvand;Ashraf-Alsadat Moazzam
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 82-86
207 views Abstract
2009
neonatal testicular torsion after cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a presentation of two cases
;Peyman Rahmanizadeh;Mohammad Reza Al-e-bouyeh;Homa Mottaghi;Ali Akbar Jafarian;Farnad Imani
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 160-166
196 views Abstract
2012
the frequency of latent prostate carcinoma in autopsies of over 50 years old males, the iranian experience
;Ali Zare-Mirzaie;Payam Balvayeh;Mohammad Ali Imamhadi;Maryam Lotfi
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 73-77
187 views Abstract
2007
arthroscopic treatment of synovial chondromatosis of the shoulder joint: case report and review
;Ali Khorsandi
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 118-122
182 views Abstract
View All 17 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.