Indexed in Journament

gaceta sanitaria

ISSN 1578-1283· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.7/100
Journament Score
#10,275
Journament Rank
31
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name gac sanit
Abbreviated Name gac sanit
ISSN 1578-1283
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/gaceta-sanitaria

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2010
Factores relacionados con el acoso escolar (bullying) en los adolescentes de Barcelona Factors related to bullying in adolescents in Barcelona (Spain)
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 103-108
599 views Abstract
2019
[Economic evaluation of the introduction of 4CMenB (Bexsero®) in the national vaccine schedule in Spain].
464 views DOI Abstract
Applying the WHO recommendations on health-sector response to violence against women to assess the Spanish health system. A mixed methods approach.
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 238-41
459 views DOI Abstract
2019
Retraction of publications: a study of biomedical journals retracting publications based on impact factor and journal category.
437 views DOI Abstract
[Gender agenda in health sciences education: international experiences to reduce time in Spain].
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 485-490
423 views DOI Abstract
[Working conditions in outpatient clinics adjacent to private pharmacies in Mexico City: perspective of physicians].
Vol. 31 , No. 6 , pp. 459-465
406 views DOI Abstract
[Transparency in public sector acquisitions. The case of hospitals in the City of Buenos Aires].
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 94-104
387 views Abstract
2020
[Affective-sexual, bodily and gender diversity beyond binarism in health sciences education].
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Informed choice in breast cancer screening: the role of education].
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Decision-making in HIV clinical trials: a study with patients enrolled in antiretroviral trials.
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Informed choice in breast cancer screening: the role of education].
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Decision-making in HIV clinical trials: a study with patients enrolled in antiretroviral trials.
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
Discrimination for gender reasons in sports
Vol. 34 , pp. 215-216
15 views DOI
2020
[Affective-sexual, bodily and gender diversity beyond binarism in health sciences education].
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Economic evaluation of the introduction of 4CMenB (Bexsero®) in the national vaccine schedule in Spain].
464 views DOI Abstract
2019
Retraction of publications: a study of biomedical journals retracting publications based on impact factor and journal category.
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Nature and health: a necessary alliance].
141 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Corporate social responsibility in the centers of the public hospital network of Catalonia (Spain)].
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Health record linkage: Andalusian health population database].
273 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
41
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

41.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.