Indexed in Journament

npj digital medicine

ISSN 2398-6352· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,496 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 94.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name npj digit med
Abbreviated Name npj digital medicine
ISSN 2398-6352

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.2
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 79.5
Innovation 36.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 80.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for npj digital medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 79.5 26.1
Innovation 36.0 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.2
Content Distribution 80.3 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2019
Respiration rate and volume measurements using wearable strain sensors
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
525 views DOI Abstract
2020
The future of sleep health: a data-driven revolution in sleep science and medicine.
Vol. 3 , pp. 42
439 views DOI Abstract
2019
Enabling Web-scale data integration in biomedicine through Linked Open Data.
Vol. 2 , pp. 90
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Satisfaction with a digitally-enabled telephone health coaching intervention for people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia.
Vol. 2 , pp. 5
402 views DOI Abstract
2020
Continuous, noninvasive wireless monitoring of flow of cerebrospinal fluid through shunts in patients with hydrocephalus.
Vol. 3 , pp. 29
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables.
Vol. 2 , pp. 31
395 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing.
Vol. 3 , pp. 7
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs).
Vol. 3 , pp. 55
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
Deep learning interpretation of echocardiograms.
Vol. 3 , pp. 10
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Desiderata for delivering NLP to accelerate healthcare AI advancement and a Mayo Clinic NLP-as-a-service implementation.
Vol. 2 , pp. 130
355 views DOI Abstract
2020
International electronic health record-derived COVID-19 clinical course profiles: the 4CE consortium.
Vol. 3 , pp. 109
263 views DOI Abstract
2020
Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs).
Vol. 3 , pp. 55
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
Continuous, noninvasive wireless monitoring of flow of cerebrospinal fluid through shunts in patients with hydrocephalus.
Vol. 3 , pp. 29
398 views DOI Abstract
2020
The future of sleep health: a data-driven revolution in sleep science and medicine.
Vol. 3 , pp. 42
439 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing.
Vol. 3 , pp. 7
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Deep learning interpretation of echocardiograms.
Vol. 3 , pp. 10
361 views DOI Abstract
2020
Blockchain vehicles for efficient Medical Record management.
Vol. 3 , pp. 1
151 views DOI Abstract
2019
Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables.
Vol. 2 , pp. 31
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Desiderata for delivering NLP to accelerate healthcare AI advancement and a Mayo Clinic NLP-as-a-service implementation.
Vol. 2 , pp. 130
355 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,496 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

79.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

36.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

80.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.