journal of the chemical society, chemical communications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2859 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
29
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of the chemical society, chemical communications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name journal of the chemical society, chemical communications
Abbreviated Name journal of the chemical society, chemical communications
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/c3
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2016
intradiscal and intra articular facet infiltrations with plasma rich in growth factors reduce pain in patients with chronic low back pain
;Fernando Kirchner;Eduardo Anitua
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 250-256
294 views DOI Abstract
1987
2,5-Dihydro-1,2,3-triazine derivatives from attempted 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of 1,2,3-triazole N-oxides with dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate: A new ring expansion
Butler, R.
, pp. 706-708
291 views DOI
1989
Synthesis of 1,3-oxaphospholes via chromium mediated cyclization of carbenes, carbon monoxide, and phospha-alkynes
Dötz, K.
, pp. 788-790
277 views DOI
2016
unilateral lag-screw technique for an isolated anterior 1/4 atlas fracture
;Semih Keskil;Murat Göksel;Ulas Yüksel
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 50-54
268 views DOI Abstract
2017
transoral screw and wire fixation for unstable anterior ½ atlas fracture
;Semih Keskil;Murat Göksel;Ulas Yüksel
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 364-368
245 views DOI Abstract
2017
functional and radiological outcomes of thoracolumbar traumatic spine fractures managed conservatively according to thoracolumbar injury severity score
;Rajdeep Singh Bagga;Arvind B Goregaonkar;Aditya Anand Dahapute;Saurabh R Muni;Sandeep Gokhale;Jitesh Manghwani
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 369-373
224 views DOI Abstract
2010
anesthesia management of a morbidly obese patient in prone position for lumbar spine surgery
;V Baxi;S Budhakar
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 55-57
216 views DOI Abstract
2015
"only fixation:" simple act, but mammoth stride toward great aspiration in managing cervical spondylotic myelopathy
;Asifur Rahman
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 137-139
213 views DOI
1987
Use of phospha-alkynes in metal aggregate synthesis. Crystal and molecular structure of the remarkable hexa-rhodium complex [Rh<inf>2</inf>Cl <inf>2</inf>{Rh(η<sup>5</sup>-C<inf>5</inf>H<inf>5</inf>)(P <inf>2</inf>C<inf>2</inf>Bu<sup>t</sup><inf>2</inf>)}<inf>4</inf>]
Hitchcock, P.
, pp. 844-845
211 views DOI
2017
atlantoaxial and subaxial cervical spinal fixation: can it revolutionize surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy related to ossified posterior longitudinal ligament?
;Atul Goel
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 5-8
206 views DOI
View All 26 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
29
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

28.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.