acta chemica scandinavica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5398 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
28
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

acta chemica scandinavica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name acta chemica scandinavica
Abbreviated Name acta chemica scandinavica
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2014
short polymorphism of the serotonin transporter (5-httlpr) gene and its association with the cortisol stress response: a meta-analysis
;Emiliano Agüero-Tejado
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 691-702
318 views DOI Abstract
1996
Preparation of 1-hydroxypyrazoles and 1-hydroxy-1,2,3-triazoles by dealkylation of pyrazole and triazole N-oxides
Begtrup, M.
Vol. 50 , pp. 549-555
296 views DOI
effectiveness of a positive psychology intervention combined with cognitive behavioral therapy in university students
;Rosario-Josefa Marrero;Monica Carballeira;Sabrina Martin;Miriam Mejias;Juan-Andrés Hernández
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 728-740
294 views DOI Abstract
2016
application of logistic regression models in observational methodology: game formats in grassroots football in initiation into football
;Daniel Lapresa;Javier Arana;M. Teresa Anguera;J. Ignacio Pérez-Castellaños;Mario Amatria
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 288-294
277 views DOI Abstract
2015
updating executive function and performance in reading comprehension and problem solving
;Valentín Iglesias-Sarmiento;Nuria Carriedo López;Juan L. Rodríguez Rodríguez
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 298-309
250 views DOI Abstract
2013
the 2d:4d ratio and its relationship with other androgenisation parameters in parents of individuals with autism spectrum disorders
;Ángel Romero-Martínez;Sara de Andrés-García;Patricia Sariñana-González;M.V. Sanchis-Calatayud;Juan M. Roa;Esperanza González-Bono;L. Moya-Albiol
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 264-271
220 views DOI Abstract
relación entre conducta prosocial, resolución de problemas y consumo de drogas en adolescentes
;Olga Hernández-Serrano;José P. Espada;Alejandro Guillén-Riquelme
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 609-616
190 views DOI Abstract
2014
relationship between early mathematical competence, gender and social background in chilean elementary school population
;Gamal Cerda;Carlos Pérez;Rosario Ortega-Ruiz
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 1006-1013
184 views DOI Abstract
2014
personality, depressive symptoms during pregnancy and their influence on postnatal depression in spanish pregnant spanish women
;Dolores Marín-Morales;Francisco J. Carmona Monge;Cecilia Peñacoba-Puente
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 908-915
182 views DOI Abstract
2014
calibration of a reading comprehension test for portuguese students
;Irene Cadime;Iolanda Ribeiro;Fernanda Leopoldina Viana;Sandra Santos;Gerardo Prieto
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 1025-1034
181 views DOI Abstract
View All 27 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
28
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

27.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.