khimiya geterotsiklicheskikh soedinenii | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1142 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

khimiya geterotsiklicheskikh soedinenii

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name khimiya geterotsiklicheskikh soedinenii
Abbreviated Name khimiya geterotsiklicheskikh soedinenii
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://hgs.osi.lv
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2013
la creatividad del lenguaje como arma social
;Edgar ÁLVAREZ-NOREÑA CUEVA
Vol. 10/1 , No. 2013 , pp. 83-94
313 views Abstract
2011
Heterocyclic analogues of 5,12-naphthacenequinone. 9. Study of reactivity and synthesis of derivatives of 4,11-dimethoxynaphtho[2,3-f]isatine-5,10-dione
Nikitina, A.
, pp. 245-256
311 views
2010
Reaction of 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazole widi alkylation agents. 7. N-Monoalkylation by polymers of monocyclic α-oxides
Sukhanova, A.
, pp. 603-609
264 views
2002
<sup>14</sup>N and <sup>15</sup>N NMR spectroscopy of 2-methyl-4,5-dinitro-1,2,3-triazole and substituted 2-methyl-4(5)nitro-1,2,3-triazole 1-oxides
Strelenko, Y.
, pp. 628-633
235 views
2008
Heterocyclic analogues of 5,12-naph- Thacenequinone. 7. Synthesis of naphtho2,3-f|isatine-5,10-dione derivatives
Shchekotikhin, A.
, pp. 1532-1536
214 views
2012
la ville et ses images. le cas de la municipalitÉ de jassy
;Mădălina PAFTALĂ-CIUBOTĂRIȚA
Vol. 9/1 , No. 2012 , pp. 40-55
208 views Abstract
2012
the health mediators and the need for an intercultural approach to health within roma communities
;Dr. Gabriel ROMAN;Dr. Rodica GRAMMA;Dr. Angela-Mariana ENACHE
Vol. 9/2 , No. 2012 , pp. 114-133
192 views Abstract
2012
in search of something new. chronicles of dutch mobilities in argentina between 1880 and 1914
;PhD Maximiliano KORSTANJE
Vol. 9/2 , No. 2012 , pp. 42-60
191 views Abstract
1996
New method of synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole-1-oxides
Godovikova, T.
, pp. 675-679
110 views
2012
par exemple... la citation
;Maria Anca FILIP
Vol. 9/1 , No. 2012 , pp. 154-172
108 views Abstract
View All 12 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

29.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.