european journal of organic chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1315 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

european journal of organic chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name european j org chem
Abbreviated Name european journal of organic chemistry
ISSN 1434-193X
Aim and Scope
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%291099-0690
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (50 total)

2019
Visible-Light-Induced Ring-Opening of Hydrogenolysis Spirocyclopropyl Oxindoles Through Photoredox Catalysis
Liu, Z.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 4085-4088
390 views DOI
2019
Balancing Bulkiness in Gold(I) Phosphino-triazole Catalysis.
Zhao, Yiming;Wakeling, Matthew G;Meloni, Fernanda;Sum, Tze Jing;van Nguyen, Huy;Buckley, Benjamin R;Davies, Paul W;Fossey, John S;
Vol. 2019 , No. 31-32 , pp. 5540-5548
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis and Evaluations of "1,4-Triazolyl Combretacoumarins" and Desmethoxy Analogues.
Khandaker, Tashrique A;Hess, Jessica D;Aguilera, Renato;Andrei, Graciela;Snoeck, Robert;Schols, Dominique;Pradhan, Padmanava;Lakshman, Mahesh K;
Vol. 2019 , No. 33 , pp. 5610-5623
321 views DOI Abstract
2013
Site-selective direct arylation of 1,2,3-triazole N-oxides
Liu, W.
, pp. 5272-5275
289 views DOI
2012
potential modification of hydration of alkali activated mixtures from granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash
;VÁCLAVA TOMKOVÁ;FILIP OVČAČÍK;JOZEF VLČEK;HANA OVČAČÍKOVÁ;MICHAELA TOPINKOVÁ;MARTIN VAVRO;PETR MARTINEC
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 168-176
289 views Abstract
2013
synthesis and characterization of high belite sulfoaluminate cement through rich alumina fly ash and desulfurization gypsum
;BING MA,;XUERUN LI;YUYI MAO;XIAODONG SHEN
Vol. 57 , No. 1 , pp. 7-13
281 views Abstract
2019
Guest Editorial to Special Issue Dedicated to N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Nifantiev, N.
Vol. 2019 , pp. 4114
278 views DOI
2018
Rhodium(III)-Catalyzed Direct C-H Alkylation of 2-Aryl-1,2,3-triazole N-Oxides with Maleimides
Zhao, J.
Vol. 2018 , pp. 6919-6923
277 views DOI
2015
Copper-catalyzed direct amination of 1,2,3-triazole N-oxides by C-H activation and C-N coupling
Zhu, J.
Vol. 2015 , pp. 1507-1515
271 views DOI
2018
First Total Synthesis of Original Chalcone–Flavone Dimers as Cissampeloflavone Analogues
Thévenin M.
Vol. 2018 , pp. 5843-5852
263 views DOI
View All 50 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.