international journal of radiation biology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#779 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

international journal of radiation biology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name int j radiat biol
Abbreviated Name int j radiat biol
ISSN 1362-3095
Aim and Scope
URL http://informahealthcare.com/rab
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (112 total)

2017
development & standardization of an in-house igm indirect elisa for the detection of parvovirus b19 infections
;Kumaran Vadivel;Mageshbabu Ramamurthy;Sathish Sankar;Amita Jain;Padma Srikanth;Asit Ranjan Ghosh;Balaji Nandagopal;Aravindan Nair;Gopalan Sridharan
Vol. 146 , No. 3 , pp. 381-385
622 views DOI Abstract
2015
utility of adenosine deaminase (ada), pcr & thoracoscopy in differentiating tuberculous & non-tuberculous pleural effusion complicating chronic kidney disease
;Sravan Kumar;Ritesh Agarwal;Amanjit Bal;Kusum Sharma;Navneet Singh;Ashutosh N Aggarwal;Indu Verma;Satyawati V Rana;Vivekanand Jha
Vol. 141 , No. 3 , pp. 308-314
578 views DOI Abstract
2013
differential induction of toll-like receptors & type 1 interferons by sabin attenuated & wild type 1 polioviruses in human neuronal cells
;Madhu C Mohanty;Jagadish M Deshpande
Vol. 138 , No. 2 , pp. 209-218
443 views Abstract
2013
prevalence of suicidal behaviour & associated factors among tuberculosis patients in public primary care in south africa
;Karl Peltzer;Julia Louw
Vol. 138 , No. 2 , pp. 194-200
367 views Abstract
2014
in vitro fertilization outcome in women with endometriosis & previous ovarian surgery
;Sonja Pop-Trajkovic;Vesna Kopitovic;Jasmina Popovic;Vladimir Antic;Dragana Radovic;Radomir Zivadinovic
Vol. 140 , No. 3 , pp. 387-391
361 views Abstract
2019
Exploring the radiosensitizing potential of magnetotherapy: a pilot study in breast cancer cells.
Salinas-Asensio, M M;Ríos-Arrabal, S;Artacho-Cordón, F;Olivares-Urbano, M A;Calvente, I;León, J;Núñez, M I;
Vol. 95 , No. 9 , pp. 1337-1345
356 views DOI Abstract
2016
prevalence & correlates of tobacco use among adolescents in kerala, india
;T S Jaisoorya;K V Beena;M Beena;Dalia C Jose;K Ellangovan;K Thennarasu;Vivek Benegal
Vol. 144 , No. 5 , pp. 704-711
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effect of simultaneous exposure of human fibroblasts to fluoride and moderate intensity static magnetic fields.
Kimsa-Dudek, Magdalena;Synowiec-Wojtarowicz, Agnieszka;Derewniuk, Małgorzata;Paul-Samojedny, Monika;Pawłowska-Góral, Katarzyna;
, pp. 1-7
327 views DOI Abstract
2014
strategies for family planning going forward - social marketing & expanding contraceptive choices package
;Vivek Malhotra;Sunitha Bhat
Vol. 140 , No. 7 , pp. 6-8
322 views
2016
prevalence of α-thalassaemia genotypes in pregnant women in northern thailand
;Somphon Pharephan;Pannee Sirivatanapa;Sanit Makonkawkeyoon;Wirote Tuntiwechapikul;Luksana Makonkawkeyoon
Vol. 143 , No. 3 , pp. 315-322
308 views DOI Abstract
View All 112 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.